Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
Symphony No 22 in E flat major, ‘The Philosopher’ (1764)
Adagio
Presto
Minuet e Trio
Finale: Presto
Although Haydn showed clear signs of musical talent from an early age, his path to fame and success was not a smooth one. Neither of his parents could read music and the small town of Rohrau on the Austrian border offered nothing in the way of training for young musical prodigies. With this in mind, his parents accepted an offer from a relative in Hainburg, Johann Matthias Franck, a choirmaster and schoolteacher who proposed to take Haydn into his home as an apprentice and train him as a musician. Although he was just six years old at the time, Haydn never returned to live with his parents; instead, after two years of uncomfortable living in the Franck household, Haydn was taken on as a chorister at St Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna, where he lived for the next nine years. When his voice began to break, however, Haydn was of little use to the choir and he was dismissed from his position, effectively rendered homeless and unemployed overnight.
Fortunately, a family friend allowed Haydn to stay in his home for a short time, and Haydn set about forging a career as a freelance musician. While he spent his days earning his keep as a music teacher and street performer, in his spare time he began honing his composition skills and addressing the topic of music theory, which had so far been lacking in his musical education. Through the painstaking completion of Fux’s counterpoint exercises and the study of music by C.P.E. Bach, Haydn’s musical knowledge broadened and his compositions improved. So much so that he soon began to attract the attention of a number of patrons and was eventually employed as Kappellmeister by Count Morzin – his first full-time employer.
After four years with Count Morzin, Haydn accepted the position of Vice Kappellmeister with one of the wealthiest and most powerful families in the Austrian empire – the Esterházy’s. He spent nearly thirty years here (having been promoted to Kappellmeister after the death of his predecessor, Gregor Werner) and it was during this period that Haydn wrote some of his most popular and important works. His musical language also changed and matured considerably during this time, gradually moving away from the techniques of the high Baroque and galant style to fully-fledged classicism.
This transition is already marked in the Symphony in E flat Major, ‘The Philosopher’, written just three years after he moved to Esterházy. Formally, the work reflects the leftover strands of the Baroque, with the four-movement plan mirroring the form of the historic sonata da chiesa: a four-movement layout that opens with a slow movement, and in which each movement is in the tonic key. Yet on an internal level the work suggests a move towards the classical style, since each movement is in sonata form – with the exception of the third movement, a minuet and trio, which itself is a classical construct. Haydn plays with this discrepancy of styles throughout the work, alluding to a mysterious and antiquated ‘church’ style in the opening movement through the use of counterpoint, suspensions and imitative textures, before seemingly dispensing with this ‘outmoded’ language in the second movement and setting the symphony off on a new, altogether more contemporary course. It is this thoughtful, provocative mix of styles that appears to have given the symphony its nickname, although Haydn never used it himself.
© Jo Kirkbride
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Chamber Concerto for 13 instruments (1969-70)
The Hungarian György Ligeti (1923-2006) is one the most fascinating and influential composers of the last century. What is most distinctive about his music is his ear for an original colour or texture, and also an approachability which is rare amongst most contemporary composers. His mature style did not emerge until after he escaped to the West in 1956, where he spent time working in the West German Radio Studio creating two ground-breaking electronic compositions. This impacted on his later instrumental works, which often sound electronic because of their innovative approach to texture and timbre. In the 1960s he devised a method of composition called ‘micropolyphony’ which consisted of many canonic layers superimposed on top of each other. This creates a dense web of lines producing a complex, ever-changing texture. Micropolyphony is used in most of Ligeti’s music up to the composition of his opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-78), and is the main technique used in the Chamber Concerto.
The Chamber Concerto was written for the Ensemble ‘die reihe’ and its conductor Friedrich Cerha; the first performance was May 1970 without the final fourth movement which was premiered in October of that year. Each movement has a contrasting sound world, and explores a range of different compositional techniques. One fundamental change in the Chamber Concerto, compared to Ligeti’s preceding music, is from a primarily textural and timbral approach, towards a gradual rediscovery of audible melody.
The first movement starts with a rich tapestry of lines in the woodwind which have a greater characterisation than in Ligeti’s earlier music – these are identifiably melodies although it is hard to hear them individually because of the way they intertwine with each other. The movement unfolds, like many of Ligeti’s micropolyphonic works, through the gradual expansion of the range of pitches used – he creates an expanding pitch wedge. Features in the movement to note are the way the material gradually moves from wind to strings and back; the use of sustained multi-octaves to ‘freeze’ time; and the interruption of a strident melody in the wind towards the end.
The second movement is the slowest of the four, and includes a remarkable section in which all the parts are moving independently at different speeds; a concept that can be seen much earlier in the music of Charles Ives. There are also soloists in this movement - the oboe d’amore the french horn, and the trombone - which take phrases of the surrounding texture and illuminate it into audible expressive melody.
The third movement is an example of Ligeti’s meccanico movements which are inspired by clocks and machines that gradually go ‘out-of-control’. He explores various textures created from repeated single pitches; most of these are moving at different tempi rather like the second movement.
The finale is a technical tour de force for the players (it was not attempted at the first performance in Britain) through its frantic and fast-moving material. Listen out for the incredible breathless duo between the piccolo and bass clarinet, and also for the piano where the directions are ‘hammering like a madman’. This is an uncompromising work which still sounds as fresh now as it did in 1970.
© Mike Searby
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Piano Concerto No 2 in B flat major, Op 83
Allegro non troppo
Allegro e passionato
Andante
Allegretto grazioso
When Brahms announced, in 1881, that he had written "quite a little piano concerto with quite a little tender scherzo ," it would have been obvious to anyone who knew him that something big was about to burst upon the world, no doubt with a turbulent scherzo. His Second Piano Concerto was actually the biggest ever. And yet, for all the heroism he attributes to his solo part, and in spite of the vast scale on which he works, Brahms maintains an almost chamber-music equality between piano and orchestra. In this respect, he remains firmly in the Viennese classical tradition, where he properly belongs.
The piano makes an early entry, in support of the horn and its poetic announcement of the main theme. After a solo cadenza , there is a regular orchestral exposition which presents the theme in a much more vigorous way. Later on in the movement the horn melody is gently recalled in its original poetic form, with the vigourous version being reserved for the coda . This is one way Brahms has of expanding the form. Another, foreshadowed by Mozart and Beethoven, is to award the piano an exposition of its own with a new theme. The orchestra's second theme is then expanded to heroic proportions, culminating in the cascade of trills which here, and in the recapitulation, mark the two main climaxes of the movement.
A work which begins like this is bound to end in serenity. But first it must pass through the turbulence of the "tender little scherzo" in D minor - without which additional movement, incidentally, the work would be shorter than Beethoven's Violin Concerto. The orchestra is liberated in the lyrical beauties of the Andante. Turbulence this time is restricted to the middle section and then, in an inspired passage for piano and two clarinets, luminously clarified before the return of the solo cello and its hymn to serenity.
Just before the end of the Andante, the piano makes a veiled reference to the beginning of the concerto, which is the final psychological preparation for the untroubled happiness of the last movement. This movement is another indication, in both its structure and the character of its main theme, of Brahms's adherence to the Viennese classical tradition. There is a melodically abundant episode in F major and, after a development devoted to the main theme, a quicker and even happier coda.
© Gerald Larner
In this and the concerts on 9 and 10 February, the SCO offers the two mightiest piano concertos of the Romantic age: two pieces which utterly broke the mould. Brahms humorously referred to his concerto as “some little piano pieces” – it is quite the opposite: a symphony for piano and orchestra. Poster returns after his April 2010 debut with Robin Ticciati and the Orchestra.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
