Welcome 2012 with a glittering, glamorous, uplifting Viennese gala evening! Strauss and Lehár bring alive a world of ballrooms, chocolate cake, chandeliers, champagne and celebrations. All the essential favourites without which no New Year is complete are here – The Blue Danube, Radetzky March et al. Soprano Elena Xanthoudakis – a regular at the Royal Opera House – adds a shot of undiluted glamour to the evening.

Welcome 2012 with a glittering, glamorous, uplifting Viennese gala evening! Strauss and Lehár bring alive a world of ballrooms, chocolate cake, chandeliers, champagne and celebrations. All the essential favourites without which no New Year is complete are here – The Blue Danube, Radetzky March et al. Soprano Elena Xanthoudakis – a regular at the Royal Opera House – adds a shot of undiluted glamour to the evening.
Call the box office today on 01387 253383.
Welcome 2012 with a glittering, glamorous, uplifting Viennese gala evening! Strauss and Lehár bring alive a world of ballrooms, chocolate cake, chandeliers, champagne and celebrations. All the essential favourites without which no New Year is complete are here – The Blue Danube, Radetzky March et al. Soprano Elena Xanthoudakis – a regular at the Royal Opera House – adds a shot of undiluted glamour to the evening.
Tickets are available from Ayr Citadel and Leisure Centre, South Harbour Street, Ayr or 01292 269793
Welcome 2012 with a glittering, glamorous, uplifting Viennese gala evening! Strauss and Lehár bring alive a world of ballrooms, chocolate cake, chandeliers, champagne and celebrations. All the essential favourites without which no New Year is complete are here – The Blue Danube, Radetzky March et al. Soprano Elena Xanthoudakis – a regular at the Royal Opera House – adds a shot of undiluted glamour to the evening.
This performance is part of the Perth Concert Series.
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Water Music Suite (1717)
Ouverture (D major)
Alla Hornpipe; Sarabande (G major)
Rigaudons I and II (G major)
Lentement (D major)
Bourree (D major)
Menuet (G major)
Gigue I and II; Minuet with trumpets (D major)
Though Handel is traditionally bracketed with Bach, they were very different German composers who went very different ways – Handel to settle in London at the age of 25, becoming a great public figure whose ultimate honour was a grave in Westminster Abbey; Bach to remain in Germany as a far more private composer, not widely appreciated until long after his death. It would be hard to imagine Bach writing music for performance on a Thames barge, but Handel revelled in such opportunities, as the gusto of his Water Music confirms.
Like some of his other works, the Water Music has collected legends the way a ship collects barnacles, but not all of them have stuck. There is, for instance, no evidence to support the belief that it was composed to patch up a quarrel between Handel and King George I who, in his previous role as Elector of Hanover, had been Handel’s employer in Germany and had resented, or so it was said, the composer’s decision to settle in England. It remains,at any rate, one of Handel’s most jubilant works, longer and more varied than was implied by the handful of movements arranged for full orchestra by Sir Hamilton Harty which popularised it - and distorted it - early in the twentieth century.
In its original form, as we now know, there is not one Water Music suite but three, each written for a different portion of an excursion by the king along the Thames from Westminster to Chelsea in 1717. The outward journey (Suite 1} proceeds buoyantly in F major. The gentler, more dancing supper scene (Suite 2) takes place in G, and the voyage home (Suite 3) follows in D. While it is a nice idea to respect Handel’s original intentions and observe his original key-scheme, a complete Water Music is inevitably a luxury which few performers today have time for. Except for special occasions, a well-chosen selection of movements is considered sufficient.
Tonight’s choice, listed above, interweaves dances from the supper scene with music designed for the journey home. Dance music, in fact, is pervasive, with robust tunes, fine airs and and rhythms which suggest Handel the German to have already acquired, in his music, a hint of an English accent, just as, during his period in Italy, he had previously developed an Italian one. As a London newspaper commented after the river trip: “So great was the number of boats that the whole river in a manner was covered. A city company’s barge was employed for the musick, where there were instruments of all sorts....the finest symphonies, composed for the occasion by Mr Handel, which His Majesty liked so well that he caused it to be played over three times in going and returning.”
© Conrad Wilson
Jean Philippe Rameau (1683-1764): Suite from ‘Dardanus’
Ouverture; Air gracieux; Tambourins (Prologue) 1 & 2; Menuet tendre en rondeau; Ritournelle (‘Isménor’); Ritournelle (‘Descente de Vénus’);Calme des sens; Gavotte vive; Chaconne; Bruit de guerre
Opera of Rameau’s time differs from the more familiar 19th century sorts in that orchestral music played a huge role – a third of any given opera might be purely instrumental. If you have never seen a complete French opera of that time, imagine something a little like a modern musical but on a grand, lavish and serious scale (almost a third of Lerner and Lowe’s Brigadoon is orchestral music ). The plot is generally a tortuous love story that ends happily having allowed the characters to demonstrate their nobility, wickedness, courage etc as required. The tale is told through singing, but also dances and incidental music which are staged with spectacular effects, scene and costume changes, battles, storms, magical transformations, huge mythic beasts to be defeated, floods… it was all very similar to your average CGI infested blockbuster film. In a good staging the effect is overwhelming, but sadly, it is hard to do that without an astonishingly lavish budget, so productions are not exactly thick on the ground. Thank heavens then for the instrumental sections that are easily extracted to form suites such as this.
Rameau clearly adored writing for the excellent musicians of the Paris Opera Orchestra. 34 string players, 10 winds and continuo – not so very different from the standard modern chamber orchestra, but the sound Rameau creates is unlike anything composed since. In particular, he cherishes the winds and gives them many, many brief solos and duos that add texture and variety to his scores. Brilliant high flutes add brilliance to tuttis; multiple oboes and bassoons enrich the middle registers.
Few of Rameau’s works enjoyed instantaneous success, and Dardanus is no exception. It was premiered in 1739, when its failure was attributed to the weakness of the libretto - little more than a stringing together of operatic clichés of the day. Rameau went back to the drawing board and produced a second version in 1744, which was a success. The two biggest musical highlights are the Overture and the Chaconne. The overture is a classic ‘French’ overture of the time, in that it opens with broad, grand music full of dotted rhythms then sweeps off into livelier fare. The Chaconne originally closed the opera. It is a long formal dance in which a simple four bar melody is elaborated at length. The simplicity of the basic idea is also the challenge to the composer: to keep delighting his audience with yet more imaginative takes on the basic short chord sequence. Rameau wrote many chaconnes, and this is reckoned to be one of the very best, full of wonderful touches. Around these great bookends, Rameau demonstrates his great emotional range from touching sentiment to the sheer joy of the Tambourins.
© Svend Brown
George Frederic Handel (1685-1756)
Cantata: Delirio Amoroso
The abandoned or spurned woman has held her own for centuries as one of the most popular characters in all music. Listening to this piece it takes little to understand why: quite simply, her plight opens her to emotions running from fury to pathos – a gift to a composer with dramatic flair. Handel - even in his early 20s as he was when he wrote this piece – was that composer.
In Rome in 1707, Handel had special reason to create a piece such as this: opera was banned by Papal decree, so poets, composers and their patrons smuggled it in in other genres. Oratorios were often little less than operas minus costumes and staging. Cantatas were generally little less than operatic scenas. In principal they were a purely musical form: a sequence of arias and recitatives (and choruses should there be one available as there was to Bach) of any length. Plot development belongs to the recits; reflection and amplification of the emotions to the arias. Here, the singer sets the scene in the opening recitative and closes with an epilogue but otherwise she takes the character of Clori. She has been rejected by Thyrsis. Maddened she imagines him dead, and pursues his spirit down into the underworld intending to rescue him. Sadly, he’s no keener on her down there than he was before: in the end she nobly settles for happy memories
What makes this cantata unusual is its scale (nigh on 35 minutes as opposed to a more usual running time of 15-20 minutes) the number of instruments involved (often there were only 2 or 3) and the fact that Handel gives the instruments two movements of their own. That has inspired speculation that there may have been dancing or at least some kind of simple staging involved. It could as well be that Handel wished to give the players their own moments in this lavish production. Handel’s patron was Cardinal Benedetto Pamphilli, (scion of one of the great Roman families that survives to this day) and he kept a high-class band led by a pupil of Corelli.
The first performance took place in the Pamphili Palace – still home to the family in central Rome. It was the first cantata Handle completed in Rome and he clearly set out to impress at the highest levels.
© Svend Brown
Emmanuelle Haïm brings a special élan and grace to everything she touches. She returns to the SCO to spark up January with zesty dance suites and a sensational showpiece for soprano Camilla Tilling – a passion-fired display of fireworks and musical fantasy composed by Handel as a young man in Italy.
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Water Music Suite (1717)
Ouverture (D major)
Alla Hornpipe; Sarabande (G major)
Rigaudons I and II (G major)
Lentement (D major)
Bourree (D major)
Menuet (G major)
Gigue I and II; Minuet with trumpets (D major)
Though Handel is traditionally bracketed with Bach, they were very different German composers who went very different ways – Handel to settle in London at the age of 25, becoming a great public figure whose ultimate honour was a grave in Westminster Abbey; Bach to remain in Germany as a far more private composer, not widely appreciated until long after his death. It would be hard to imagine Bach writing music for performance on a Thames barge, but Handel revelled in such opportunities, as the gusto of his Water Music confirms.
Like some of his other works, the Water Music has collected legends the way a ship collects barnacles, but not all of them have stuck. There is, for instance, no evidence to support the belief that it was composed to patch up a quarrel between Handel and King George I who, in his previous role as Elector of Hanover, had been Handel’s employer in Germany and had resented, or so it was said, the composer’s decision to settle in England. It remains,at any rate, one of Handel’s most jubilant works, longer and more varied than was implied by the handful of movements arranged for full orchestra by Sir Hamilton Harty which popularised it - and distorted it - early in the twentieth century.
In its original form, as we now know, there is not one Water Music suite but three, each written for a different portion of an excursion by the king along the Thames from Westminster to Chelsea in 1717. The outward journey (Suite 1} proceeds buoyantly in F major. The gentler, more dancing supper scene (Suite 2) takes place in G, and the voyage home (Suite 3) follows in D. While it is a nice idea to respect Handel’s original intentions and observe his original key-scheme, a complete Water Music is inevitably a luxury which few performers today have time for. Except for special occasions, a well-chosen selection of movements is considered sufficient.
Tonight’s choice, listed above, interweaves dances from the supper scene with music designed for the journey home. Dance music, in fact, is pervasive, with robust tunes, fine airs and and rhythms which suggest Handel the German to have already acquired, in his music, a hint of an English accent, just as, during his period in Italy, he had previously developed an Italian one. As a London newspaper commented after the river trip: “So great was the number of boats that the whole river in a manner was covered. A city company’s barge was employed for the musick, where there were instruments of all sorts....the finest symphonies, composed for the occasion by Mr Handel, which His Majesty liked so well that he caused it to be played over three times in going and returning.”
© Conrad Wilson
Jean Philippe Rameau (1683-1764): Suite from ‘Dardanus’
Ouverture; Air gracieux; Tambourins (Prologue) 1 & 2; Menuet tendre en rondeau; Ritournelle (‘Isménor’); Ritournelle (‘Descente de Vénus’);Calme des sens; Gavotte vive; Chaconne; Bruit de guerre
Opera of Rameau’s time differs from the more familiar 19th century sorts in that orchestral music played a huge role – a third of any given opera might be purely instrumental. If you have never seen a complete French opera of that time, imagine something a little like a modern musical but on a grand, lavish and serious scale (almost a third of Lerner and Lowe’s Brigadoon is orchestral music ). The plot is generally a tortuous love story that ends happily having allowed the characters to demonstrate their nobility, wickedness, courage etc as required. The tale is told through singing, but also dances and incidental music which are staged with spectacular effects, scene and costume changes, battles, storms, magical transformations, huge mythic beasts to be defeated, floods… it was all very similar to your average CGI infested blockbuster film. In a good staging the effect is overwhelming, but sadly, it is hard to do that without an astonishingly lavish budget, so productions are not exactly thick on the ground. Thank heavens then for the instrumental sections that are easily extracted to form suites such as this.
Rameau clearly adored writing for the excellent musicians of the Paris Opera Orchestra. 34 string players, 10 winds and continuo – not so very different from the standard modern chamber orchestra, but the sound Rameau creates is unlike anything composed since. In particular, he cherishes the winds and gives them many, many brief solos and duos that add texture and variety to his scores. Brilliant high flutes add brilliance to tuttis; multiple oboes and bassoons enrich the middle registers.
Few of Rameau’s works enjoyed instantaneous success, and Dardanus is no exception. It was premiered in 1739, when its failure was attributed to the weakness of the libretto - little more than a stringing together of operatic clichés of the day. Rameau went back to the drawing board and produced a second version in 1744, which was a success. The two biggest musical highlights are the Overture and the Chaconne. The overture is a classic ‘French’ overture of the time, in that it opens with broad, grand music full of dotted rhythms then sweeps off into livelier fare. The Chaconne originally closed the opera. It is a long formal dance in which a simple four bar melody is elaborated at length. The simplicity of the basic idea is also the challenge to the composer: to keep delighting his audience with yet more imaginative takes on the basic short chord sequence. Rameau wrote many chaconnes, and this is reckoned to be one of the very best, full of wonderful touches. Around these great bookends, Rameau demonstrates his great emotional range from touching sentiment to the sheer joy of the Tambourins.
© Svend Brown
George Frederic Handel (1685-1756)
Cantata: Delirio Amoroso
The abandoned or spurned woman has held her own for centuries as one of the most popular characters in all music. Listening to this piece it takes little to understand why: quite simply, her plight opens her to emotions running from fury to pathos – a gift to a composer with dramatic flair. Handel - even in his early 20s as he was when he wrote this piece – was that composer.
In Rome in 1707, Handel had special reason to create a piece such as this: opera was banned by Papal decree, so poets, composers and their patrons smuggled it in in other genres. Oratorios were often little less than operas minus costumes and staging. Cantatas were generally little less than operatic scenas. In principal they were a purely musical form: a sequence of arias and recitatives (and choruses should there be one available as there was to Bach) of any length. Plot development belongs to the recits; reflection and amplification of the emotions to the arias. Here, the singer sets the scene in the opening recitative and closes with an epilogue but otherwise she takes the character of Clori. She has been rejected by Thyrsis. Maddened she imagines him dead, and pursues his spirit down into the underworld intending to rescue him. Sadly, he’s no keener on her down there than he was before: in the end she nobly settles for happy memories
What makes this cantata unusual is its scale (nigh on 35 minutes as opposed to a more usual running time of 15-20 minutes) the number of instruments involved (often there were only 2 or 3) and the fact that Handel gives the instruments two movements of their own. That has inspired speculation that there may have been dancing or at least some kind of simple staging involved. It could as well be that Handel wished to give the players their own moments in this lavish production. Handel’s patron was Cardinal Benedetto Pamphilli, (scion of one of the great Roman families that survives to this day) and he kept a high-class band led by a pupil of Corelli.
The first performance took place in the Pamphili Palace – still home to the family in central Rome. It was the first cantata Handle completed in Rome and he clearly set out to impress at the highest levels.
© Svend Brown
Emmanuelle Haïm brings a special élan and grace to everything she touches. She returns to the SCO to spark up January with zesty dance suites and a sensational showpiece for soprano Camilla Tilling – a passion-fired display of fireworks and musical fantasy composed by Handel as a young man in Italy.
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Water Music Suite (1717)
Ouverture (D major)
Alla Hornpipe; Sarabande (G major)
Rigaudons I and II (G major)
Lentement (D major)
Bourree (D major)
Menuet (G major)
Gigue I and II; Minuet with trumpets (D major)
Though Handel is traditionally bracketed with Bach, they were very different German composers who went very different ways – Handel to settle in London at the age of 25, becoming a great public figure whose ultimate honour was a grave in Westminster Abbey; Bach to remain in Germany as a far more private composer, not widely appreciated until long after his death. It would be hard to imagine Bach writing music for performance on a Thames barge, but Handel revelled in such opportunities, as the gusto of his Water Music confirms.
Like some of his other works, the Water Music has collected legends the way a ship collects barnacles, but not all of them have stuck. There is, for instance, no evidence to support the belief that it was composed to patch up a quarrel between Handel and King George I who, in his previous role as Elector of Hanover, had been Handel’s employer in Germany and had resented, or so it was said, the composer’s decision to settle in England. It remains,at any rate, one of Handel’s most jubilant works, longer and more varied than was implied by the handful of movements arranged for full orchestra by Sir Hamilton Harty which popularised it - and distorted it - early in the twentieth century.
In its original form, as we now know, there is not one Water Music suite but three, each written for a different portion of an excursion by the king along the Thames from Westminster to Chelsea in 1717. The outward journey (Suite 1} proceeds buoyantly in F major. The gentler, more dancing supper scene (Suite 2) takes place in G, and the voyage home (Suite 3) follows in D. While it is a nice idea to respect Handel’s original intentions and observe his original key-scheme, a complete Water Music is inevitably a luxury which few performers today have time for. Except for special occasions, a well-chosen selection of movements is considered sufficient.
Tonight’s choice, listed above, interweaves dances from the supper scene with music designed for the journey home. Dance music, in fact, is pervasive, with robust tunes, fine airs and and rhythms which suggest Handel the German to have already acquired, in his music, a hint of an English accent, just as, during his period in Italy, he had previously developed an Italian one. As a London newspaper commented after the river trip: “So great was the number of boats that the whole river in a manner was covered. A city company’s barge was employed for the musick, where there were instruments of all sorts....the finest symphonies, composed for the occasion by Mr Handel, which His Majesty liked so well that he caused it to be played over three times in going and returning.”
© Conrad Wilson
Jean Philippe Rameau (1683-1764): Suite from ‘Dardanus’
Ouverture; Air gracieux; Tambourins (Prologue) 1 & 2; Menuet tendre en rondeau; Ritournelle (‘Isménor’); Ritournelle (‘Descente de Vénus’);Calme des sens; Gavotte vive; Chaconne; Bruit de guerre
Opera of Rameau’s time differs from the more familiar 19th century sorts in that orchestral music played a huge role – a third of any given opera might be purely instrumental. If you have never seen a complete French opera of that time, imagine something a little like a modern musical but on a grand, lavish and serious scale (almost a third of Lerner and Lowe’s Brigadoon is orchestral music ). The plot is generally a tortuous love story that ends happily having allowed the characters to demonstrate their nobility, wickedness, courage etc as required. The tale is told through singing, but also dances and incidental music which are staged with spectacular effects, scene and costume changes, battles, storms, magical transformations, huge mythic beasts to be defeated, floods… it was all very similar to your average CGI infested blockbuster film. In a good staging the effect is overwhelming, but sadly, it is hard to do that without an astonishingly lavish budget, so productions are not exactly thick on the ground. Thank heavens then for the instrumental sections that are easily extracted to form suites such as this.
Rameau clearly adored writing for the excellent musicians of the Paris Opera Orchestra. 34 string players, 10 winds and continuo – not so very different from the standard modern chamber orchestra, but the sound Rameau creates is unlike anything composed since. In particular, he cherishes the winds and gives them many, many brief solos and duos that add texture and variety to his scores. Brilliant high flutes add brilliance to tuttis; multiple oboes and bassoons enrich the middle registers.
Few of Rameau’s works enjoyed instantaneous success, and Dardanus is no exception. It was premiered in 1739, when its failure was attributed to the weakness of the libretto - little more than a stringing together of operatic clichés of the day. Rameau went back to the drawing board and produced a second version in 1744, which was a success. The two biggest musical highlights are the Overture and the Chaconne. The overture is a classic ‘French’ overture of the time, in that it opens with broad, grand music full of dotted rhythms then sweeps off into livelier fare. The Chaconne originally closed the opera. It is a long formal dance in which a simple four bar melody is elaborated at length. The simplicity of the basic idea is also the challenge to the composer: to keep delighting his audience with yet more imaginative takes on the basic short chord sequence. Rameau wrote many chaconnes, and this is reckoned to be one of the very best, full of wonderful touches. Around these great bookends, Rameau demonstrates his great emotional range from touching sentiment to the sheer joy of the Tambourins.
© Svend Brown
George Frederic Handel (1685-1756)
Cantata: Delirio Amoroso
The abandoned or spurned woman has held her own for centuries as one of the most popular characters in all music. Listening to this piece it takes little to understand why: quite simply, her plight opens her to emotions running from fury to pathos – a gift to a composer with dramatic flair. Handel - even in his early 20s as he was when he wrote this piece – was that composer.
In Rome in 1707, Handel had special reason to create a piece such as this: opera was banned by Papal decree, so poets, composers and their patrons smuggled it in in other genres. Oratorios were often little less than operas minus costumes and staging. Cantatas were generally little less than operatic scenas. In principal they were a purely musical form: a sequence of arias and recitatives (and choruses should there be one available as there was to Bach) of any length. Plot development belongs to the recits; reflection and amplification of the emotions to the arias. Here, the singer sets the scene in the opening recitative and closes with an epilogue but otherwise she takes the character of Clori. She has been rejected by Thyrsis. Maddened she imagines him dead, and pursues his spirit down into the underworld intending to rescue him. Sadly, he’s no keener on her down there than he was before: in the end she nobly settles for happy memories
What makes this cantata unusual is its scale (nigh on 35 minutes as opposed to a more usual running time of 15-20 minutes) the number of instruments involved (often there were only 2 or 3) and the fact that Handel gives the instruments two movements of their own. That has inspired speculation that there may have been dancing or at least some kind of simple staging involved. It could as well be that Handel wished to give the players their own moments in this lavish production. Handel’s patron was Cardinal Benedetto Pamphilli, (scion of one of the great Roman families that survives to this day) and he kept a high-class band led by a pupil of Corelli.
The first performance took place in the Pamphili Palace – still home to the family in central Rome. It was the first cantata Handle completed in Rome and he clearly set out to impress at the highest levels.
© Svend Brown
Emmanuelle Haïm brings a special élan and grace to everything she touches. She returns to the SCO to spark up January with zesty dance suites and a sensational showpiece for soprano Camilla Tilling – a passion-fired display of fireworks and musical fantasy composed by Handel as a young man in Italy.
Joseph Haydn (1732–1809)
Symphony No 6 in D major (Le Matin)
Adagio – Allegro
Adagio – Andante – Adagio
Menuet and Trio
Finale: Allegro
Symphony No 7 in C major (Le Midi)
Adagio – Allegro
Recitativo: Adagio – Allegro – Adagio –Adagio
Menuetto and Trio
Finale: Allegro
Symphony No 8 in G major (Le Soir)
Allegro molto
Andante
Menuetto and Trio
La Tempesta: Presto
Haydn’s Symphonies Nos 6, 7 and 8 are the first three symphonies which he wrote for the Esterházy family: they date from 1761, the year in which he took up the post of Vice-Kapellmeister and director of the orchestra at the palace of Eisenstadt, beginning nearly thirty years of continuous service to the family. It seems to have been at the suggestion of Prince Paul Anton Esterházy that Haydn composed a trilogy of symphonies depicting morning, afternoon and evening – a plan which may have been inspired by Telemann’s cantata The Times of Day, or more probably (since the work was in the Esterházy library) by Vivaldi’s concerto cycle The Four Seasons. On the whole, Haydn did not provide nearly as much descriptive detail as there is in these Baroque antecedents. But he did follow through in a much more systematic way a scheme which may perhaps have been his own idea: to write a set of symphonies showing off the talents of his new colleagues in the Esterházy orchestra.
The orchestra in all three works is a small one: flute, two oboes, bassoon, two horns, probably a harpsichord (from which Haydn would have directed), and strings. (There is also a second flute in the later part of the slow movement of No. 7: since the oboes are silent at that point, one of the oboists presumably put down his instrument and picked up a flute.) But Haydn scatters through his scores not only passages highlighting each wind principal and section, as was his custom, but also solos for the leader, the principal second violinist (in Nos. 7 and 8), the principal violist (in one movement of No. 6), the principal cellist, and even the principal double bass. The result is a greater variety of colours and textures than Haydn was to attempt again in his symphonies over the next few years – anticipating the genre of the sinfonia concertante, or multiple concerto, that was to become popular much later in his career.
The 'Morning' Symphony begins with a slow introduction, a six-bar crescendo presumably representing a sunrise. This leads to a triple-time Allegro including some solo writing for the flute, the two oboes, and, in a fanfaring anticipation of the closing recapitulation section, the first horn. The G major slow movement is a reminder that Haydn was writing in the shadow of the Baroque masters (still within the lifetimes of, for example, Telemann and Rameau): like many a Baroque work, it is scored for strings alone, with ornate solos for violin and cello; and the central Andante is framed by an Adagio introduction, with solo violin, and an Adagio coda – the overall shape of the movement and the style of the coda both recalling the influential string Concerti Grossi of Corelli. The Minuet restores the full orchestra and a variety of colouring: solo flute in the first section, the wind band on its own in the second, and then in the minor-key Trio solo double bass, alternating with solo viola and cello, and solo bassoon. The Finale includes more solo passages for various instruments, including an especially dashing violin solo which lasts virtually the whole of the central development section, and a bright fanfare for the two horns near the start of the recapitulation.
The 'Afternoon' Symphony starts, like its predecessor, with a slow introduction leading to a triple-time Allegro. But this time the introduction is longer and more full-textured, with imperious dotted rhythms and sharp contrasts of loud and soft, perhaps suggesting the glare of the midday sun and the deep shadows it produces; while most of the solo passages in the Allegro are allocated not to wind instruments but to two violins and cello. The second movement is an instrumental recitative, ingeniously translated from the opera house, with the first violinist as the capricious prima donna, accompanied by two oboes and strings. This is followed by the obvious next step, an aria (in G major), with the violinist again as soloist and a mellifluous pair of flutes joining the strings (we can imagine some suitable words about little birds singing in the trees); but after a while a solo cello also makes an entrance, and the movement continues as a duet, culminating in an elaborate double cadenza. The horns celebrate their return quite spectacularly in the Minuet; the Trio gives the double bass another taxing solo. The Finale is, like that of “Morning”, an Allegro in 2/4 time with concertante writing spread generously round the orchestra – though if one player stands out this time, it is the agile flautist.
The 'Evening' symphony plunges without a slow introduction into much the quickest of the three first movements in the trilogy: this is indicated not only by the tempo marking of “very fast” but also by the time-signature of 3/8 rather than 3/4. The solo writing is confined here to a few brief flourishes for the wind instruments, and the interest of the movement lies chiefly in the way it anticipates Haydn’s mature symphonic style, with its sense of forward movement and its resourceful use of the opening idea. Much more old-fashioned by comparison is the C major slow movement, in the ornate, “galant” style of the mid-century; and here there is concertante writing in plenty, for two solo violins and a solo cello, and also for the only wind instrument used in the movement, the bassoon. The sturdy Minuet has a brief passage for the wind band alone; the Trio provides the double bass with another demanding solo. The Symphony ends with a programmatic movement depicting an evening storm: there is plenty of tremulous solo violin writing, in the tradition of Vivaldi’s Four Seasons, and there are also rumbles of thunder from the solo cello, flickers of lightning from the flute, and a great deal of sound and fury from the whole orchestra.
© Anthony Burton
Haydn’s morning, noon and night symphonies are akin to Vivaldi’s Four Seasons – but instead of a whole year, Haydn describes a single day in the life of your average aristocrat. Starting with a ravishing sunrise he progresses through hunting, dancing, bucolic pleasures and formal occasions, sunset and night. He wrote this music for the superb orchestra where he worked at Eisenstadt, so the music is peppered with lovely solos for the star musicians.
Zoltán Kodály (1882-1967)
Dances of Galánta
Galánta is a small town about twenty-five miles east of Bratislava, in what is now Slovakia. Kodály spent seven years of his childhood there (his father was the local station-master), and it was the scene of his first folk-song collecting expedition in 1905. The town’s gypsy band had a wide reputation, and a collection of its traditional tunes was published in Vienna about 1800.
In 1933 Kodály was commissioned to write an orchestral piece to mark the eightieth anniversary of the Budapest Philharmonic Society. In response he produced what has since become one of his most popular works, based on tunes from that 1800 collection.
A slow introduction ends with a short cadenza for solo clarinet, an instrument which plays an important role throughout the piece. The cadenza leads directly into the first dance, a stately tune which has the characteristically jerky rhythm of the verbunkos, a dance traditionally associated with village recruiting fairs. This returns between the remaining dances giving the work a rondo-like shape.
Flutes and piccolo take the lead in the quicker second dance, which culminates in a passionate, fully-scored re-appearance of the verbunkos melody. As this dies down, a graceful new dance starts up on solo oboe, with violin harmonics and glockenspiel contributing to Kodály’s engagingly delicate scoring. Only a few bars of the verbunkos link this to the next dance, characterised by its syncopated rhythm. Considerable excitement builds, but it all stops abruptly for a slower section with a perky clarinet tune over a heavy, low-pitched accompaniment.
Gradually the tempo picks up again, and we are whirled into the headlong excitement of the final section, to which the syncopated idea from the earlier dance makes its contribution. It is interrupted just before the end by a quiet reminiscence of the verbunkos, before the last exhilarating flourish.
© Mike Wheeler
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Hamburg Concerto for horn and chamber orchestra (1999 rev. 2002)
György Ligeti (1923-2006) is one the leading and most distinctive composers of the last century. He was born in Hungary but did not have much impact on the musical world until he escaped to the West in 1956 where he met Stockhausen. Ligeti was never part of the Darmstadt avant garde school of the 1950s and 1960s, and was more interested in finding his own solution to the problems of composing within a Modernist aesthetic. His most well-known music is that which is primarily textural, and uses what he described as ‘micropolyphony’; a highly complex and dense canonic music. This music became widely known through its use in Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) for which Ligeti did not originally get paid.
The Hamburg Concerto is from Ligeti’s late period but still shows many features from his earlier music, such as an interest in texture, timbre and micro-tunings. Ligeti’s later music, from the opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-78) onwards, shows a much more eclectic approach to compositional technique, with influences from Sub-Saharan music, the music of the American composer Conlon Nancarrow, and embracing elements of the music of the past. The result was that Ligeti’s music became much more approachable and tonal at times, but also quite unpredictable.
The most distinctive aspect of the Hamburg Concerto is its use of natural harmonics in the solo and quartet of natural horns (ones without valves). The natural harmonics are those notes that you get on any brass instrument from one length of the tubing, and the higher harmonics do not fit into the usual equal tempered tuning system. These harmonics, when combined, and with equal tempered instruments, produce ‘dirty’ harmonies which Ligeti has often used in his music. Ligeti comments that “these harmonies, which have never been used before, sound ‘weird’ in relation to harmonic spectra.”
Ligeti had written for the solo horn before in the Horn Trio (1982), in which the reflective and romantic aspect of the instrument is emphasised with echoes of Brahms’s Horn Trio. But in the Concerto there is a greater allusion to the hunting horn, for example in the second movement 'Signale, Tanz, Choral' and in the sixth movement 'Capriccio'.
Overall, the Hamburg Concerto is a bewildering array of highly characterised short, sketch-like movements exploring many of Ligeti’s styles. Although the work is apparently in seven movements, movements 2, 3, and 4 are divided into three or four clear sections – thus the work is really in 14 movements over 15 minutes. There is almost no development of the material, and the ideas are exposed very briefly before the movement ends. This approach is reminiscent of that in Ligeti’s three books of piano Études (1985-2001) in which each short étude is self-contained with one basic musical idea. The variety of styles include very static sustained music in the 'Praeludium' which hints at Ligeti’s earlier micropolyphonic works such as Lontano. 'Capriccio' starts in a very lively carefree fashion but later the movement abruptly changes mood, and Ligeti quotes his poignant ‘lament motive’ which consists of a descending chromatic line used in earlier works such as the Horn Trio. The final movement 'Hymnus' creates a shattering climax through a gradual evolution towards very loud and close microtonal harmony in the horns.
© Mike Searby
Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904)
Symphony No. 5 in F major (1875)
I: Allegro ma non troppo
II: Andante con moto
III: Andante con moto, quasi l'istesso tempo - Allegro scherzando
IV: Finale: Allegro molto
Dvořák’s ascent to fame was a swift one, helped in no small part by a stipend he received from the Austrian Government in 1874. The young Dvořák, at that time working as an orchestral violist and church organist, submitted a number of his works to a judging committee that included both Johannes Brahms and the critic Eduard Hanslick. He was successful – winning a significant stipend not just that year, but also in 1876 and 1877, and with the help of Brahms and Hanslick he also found a publisher for his music. Buoyed by his successes, 1875 proved to be one of the most creatively fertile years of his life, with the completion of his opera Vanda, his first Piano Trio and Piano Quartet, his second String Quintet, the Serenade for Strings, a handful of other chamber music, and his Fifth Symphony.
At this early stage in his career, Dvořák’s works conformed to a popular ‘nationalist’ style, with the use of ‘exotic’ Czech folksong proving an easy – perhaps even opportunistic – method of attracting the attention of the critics, which were dominated by the Austro-Germanic provinces. But beneath the veneer of this folk style, Dvořák’s works display a cyclical coherence not seen since Beethoven, and his rigorous approach to form signals his clear allusions to Brahms and the symphonic tradition. His Fifth Symphony in F major marks a milestone in his development as a composer, for the first time marrying the Czech folksong of his earlier years with a mature command of symphonic form. While many of his earlier works bear the traces of Wagnerian harmonic colouring and Mahlerian motivic design, in the Fifth Symphony Dvořák finally seems comfortable with his own voice.
Though not specifically a programmatic symphony, the pastoral key (F major) sets the tone for a pastoral work, which begins with a buoyant Allegro and pairs of woodwinds – first clarinets, then flutes – introduce the chirruping, bird-like opening theme. The vibrant woodland scene is set and the winds are quickly joined by the full orchestra in what amounts to a rich panorama of the surrounding landscape. By contrast, the melancholy Andante in A minor that follows opens with a sombre melody for the cellos – borrowed, it appears, from the opening movement of Tchaikovsky’s First Piano Concerto, which was completed earlier the same year. Whether Dvořák might have heard Tchaikovsky’s work before completing his own is unclear, but Dvořák’s treatment of theme is altogether more tender than that of his contemporary, spinning out the similar four-note motive into a much softer, languorous slow movement. The slow movement eventually comes to a firm close after a final glimpse of the four-note motive, but in a cyclical Beethovenian move, Dvořák briefly reprises the theme at the opening of the third movement. This reprise segues into the sprightly Allegro scherzando, which once more returns us to the pastoral landscape, so it is quite a shock when this graceful dance concludes and we are launched head-first into the tumultuous finale – which begins, unexpectedly, in A minor. It remains for the finale to find its way back to the tonic of F major – a battle that occupies the whole of the last movement and which endures as one of Dvořák’s most breathtaking and innovative symphonic moments.
© Jo Kirkbride
Millions ‘discovered’ Ligeti without realising it when Kubrick peppered the soundtrack of 2001: A Space Odyssey with his work. It gave him popular success, and few would dispute that he is one of the five most important composers of the past 40 years. Here is a chance, over two weeks, to hear two very different but equally fine scores by him. The ‘Hamburg’ Concerto pays tribute to Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos. Ticciati performs it with popular favourites from Central Europe.
Sir Charles Mackerras conducts the Scottish Chamber Orchestra in Kodály's Dances of Galánta. Buy from the SCO Online Shop
Zoltán Kodály (1882-1967)
Dances of Galánta
Galánta is a small town about twenty-five miles east of Bratislava, in what is now Slovakia. Kodály spent seven years of his childhood there (his father was the local station-master), and it was the scene of his first folk-song collecting expedition in 1905. The town’s gypsy band had a wide reputation, and a collection of its traditional tunes was published in Vienna about 1800.
In 1933 Kodály was commissioned to write an orchestral piece to mark the eightieth anniversary of the Budapest Philharmonic Society. In response he produced what has since become one of his most popular works, based on tunes from that 1800 collection.
A slow introduction ends with a short cadenza for solo clarinet, an instrument which plays an important role throughout the piece. The cadenza leads directly into the first dance, a stately tune which has the characteristically jerky rhythm of the verbunkos, a dance traditionally associated with village recruiting fairs. This returns between the remaining dances giving the work a rondo-like shape.
Flutes and piccolo take the lead in the quicker second dance, which culminates in a passionate, fully-scored re-appearance of the verbunkos melody. As this dies down, a graceful new dance starts up on solo oboe, with violin harmonics and glockenspiel contributing to Kodály’s engagingly delicate scoring. Only a few bars of the verbunkos link this to the next dance, characterised by its syncopated rhythm. Considerable excitement builds, but it all stops abruptly for a slower section with a perky clarinet tune over a heavy, low-pitched accompaniment.
Gradually the tempo picks up again, and we are whirled into the headlong excitement of the final section, to which the syncopated idea from the earlier dance makes its contribution. It is interrupted just before the end by a quiet reminiscence of the verbunkos, before the last exhilarating flourish.
© Mike Wheeler
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Hamburg Concerto for horn and chamber orchestra (1999 rev. 2002)
György Ligeti (1923-2006) is one the leading and most distinctive composers of the last century. He was born in Hungary but did not have much impact on the musical world until he escaped to the West in 1956 where he met Stockhausen. Ligeti was never part of the Darmstadt avant garde school of the 1950s and 1960s, and was more interested in finding his own solution to the problems of composing within a Modernist aesthetic. His most well-known music is that which is primarily textural, and uses what he described as ‘micropolyphony’; a highly complex and dense canonic music. This music became widely known through its use in Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) for which Ligeti did not originally get paid.
The Hamburg Concerto is from Ligeti’s late period but still shows many features from his earlier music, such as an interest in texture, timbre and micro-tunings. Ligeti’s later music, from the opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-78) onwards, shows a much more eclectic approach to compositional technique, with influences from Sub-Saharan music, the music of the American composer Conlon Nancarrow, and embracing elements of the music of the past. The result was that Ligeti’s music became much more approachable and tonal at times, but also quite unpredictable.
The most distinctive aspect of the Hamburg Concerto is its use of natural harmonics in the solo and quartet of natural horns (ones without valves). The natural harmonics are those notes that you get on any brass instrument from one length of the tubing, and the higher harmonics do not fit into the usual equal tempered tuning system. These harmonics, when combined, and with equal tempered instruments, produce ‘dirty’ harmonies which Ligeti has often used in his music. Ligeti comments that “these harmonies, which have never been used before, sound ‘weird’ in relation to harmonic spectra.”
Ligeti had written for the solo horn before in the Horn Trio (1982), in which the reflective and romantic aspect of the instrument is emphasised with echoes of Brahms’s Horn Trio. But in the Concerto there is a greater allusion to the hunting horn, for example in the second movement 'Signale, Tanz, Choral' and in the sixth movement 'Capriccio'.
Overall, the Hamburg Concerto is a bewildering array of highly characterised short, sketch-like movements exploring many of Ligeti’s styles. Although the work is apparently in seven movements, movements 2, 3, and 4 are divided into three or four clear sections – thus the work is really in 14 movements over 15 minutes. There is almost no development of the material, and the ideas are exposed very briefly before the movement ends. This approach is reminiscent of that in Ligeti’s three books of piano Études (1985-2001) in which each short étude is self-contained with one basic musical idea. The variety of styles include very static sustained music in the 'Praeludium' which hints at Ligeti’s earlier micropolyphonic works such as Lontano. 'Capriccio' starts in a very lively carefree fashion but later the movement abruptly changes mood, and Ligeti quotes his poignant ‘lament motive’ which consists of a descending chromatic line used in earlier works such as the Horn Trio. The final movement 'Hymnus' creates a shattering climax through a gradual evolution towards very loud and close microtonal harmony in the horns.
© Mike Searby
Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904)
Symphony No. 5 in F major (1875)
I: Allegro ma non troppo
II: Andante con moto
III: Andante con moto, quasi l'istesso tempo - Allegro scherzando
IV: Finale: Allegro molto
Dvořák’s ascent to fame was a swift one, helped in no small part by a stipend he received from the Austrian Government in 1874. The young Dvořák, at that time working as an orchestral violist and church organist, submitted a number of his works to a judging committee that included both Johannes Brahms and the critic Eduard Hanslick. He was successful – winning a significant stipend not just that year, but also in 1876 and 1877, and with the help of Brahms and Hanslick he also found a publisher for his music. Buoyed by his successes, 1875 proved to be one of the most creatively fertile years of his life, with the completion of his opera Vanda, his first Piano Trio and Piano Quartet, his second String Quintet, the Serenade for Strings, a handful of other chamber music, and his Fifth Symphony.
At this early stage in his career, Dvořák’s works conformed to a popular ‘nationalist’ style, with the use of ‘exotic’ Czech folksong proving an easy – perhaps even opportunistic – method of attracting the attention of the critics, which were dominated by the Austro-Germanic provinces. But beneath the veneer of this folk style, Dvořák’s works display a cyclical coherence not seen since Beethoven, and his rigorous approach to form signals his clear allusions to Brahms and the symphonic tradition. His Fifth Symphony in F major marks a milestone in his development as a composer, for the first time marrying the Czech folksong of his earlier years with a mature command of symphonic form. While many of his earlier works bear the traces of Wagnerian harmonic colouring and Mahlerian motivic design, in the Fifth Symphony Dvořák finally seems comfortable with his own voice.
Though not specifically a programmatic symphony, the pastoral key (F major) sets the tone for a pastoral work, which begins with a buoyant Allegro and pairs of woodwinds – first clarinets, then flutes – introduce the chirruping, bird-like opening theme. The vibrant woodland scene is set and the winds are quickly joined by the full orchestra in what amounts to a rich panorama of the surrounding landscape. By contrast, the melancholy Andante in A minor that follows opens with a sombre melody for the cellos – borrowed, it appears, from the opening movement of Tchaikovsky’s First Piano Concerto, which was completed earlier the same year. Whether Dvořák might have heard Tchaikovsky’s work before completing his own is unclear, but Dvořák’s treatment of theme is altogether more tender than that of his contemporary, spinning out the similar four-note motive into a much softer, languorous slow movement. The slow movement eventually comes to a firm close after a final glimpse of the four-note motive, but in a cyclical Beethovenian move, Dvořák briefly reprises the theme at the opening of the third movement. This reprise segues into the sprightly Allegro scherzando, which once more returns us to the pastoral landscape, so it is quite a shock when this graceful dance concludes and we are launched head-first into the tumultuous finale – which begins, unexpectedly, in A minor. It remains for the finale to find its way back to the tonic of F major – a battle that occupies the whole of the last movement and which endures as one of Dvořák’s most breathtaking and innovative symphonic moments.
© Jo Kirkbride
Millions ‘discovered’ Ligeti without realising it when Kubrick peppered the soundtrack of 2001: A Space Odyssey with his work. It gave him popular success, and few would dispute that he is one of the five most important composers of the past 40 years. Here is a chance, over two weeks, to hear two very different but equally fine scores by him. The ‘Hamburg’ Concerto pays tribute to Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos. Ticciati performs it with popular favourites from Central Europe.
Sir Charles Mackerras conducts the Scottish Chamber Orchestra in Kodály's Dances of Galánta. Buy from the SCO Online Shop
Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
Symphony No 22 in E flat major, ‘The Philosopher’ (1764)
Adagio
Presto
Minuet e Trio
Finale: Presto
Although Haydn showed clear signs of musical talent from an early age, his path to fame and success was not a smooth one. Neither of his parents could read music and the small town of Rohrau on the Austrian border offered nothing in the way of training for young musical prodigies. With this in mind, his parents accepted an offer from a relative in Hainburg, Johann Matthias Franck, a choirmaster and schoolteacher who proposed to take Haydn into his home as an apprentice and train him as a musician. Although he was just six years old at the time, Haydn never returned to live with his parents; instead, after two years of uncomfortable living in the Franck household, Haydn was taken on as a chorister at St Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna, where he lived for the next nine years. When his voice began to break, however, Haydn was of little use to the choir and he was dismissed from his position, effectively rendered homeless and unemployed overnight.
Fortunately, a family friend allowed Haydn to stay in his home for a short time, and Haydn set about forging a career as a freelance musician. While he spent his days earning his keep as a music teacher and street performer, in his spare time he began honing his composition skills and addressing the topic of music theory, which had so far been lacking in his musical education. Through the painstaking completion of Fux’s counterpoint exercises and the study of music by C.P.E. Bach, Haydn’s musical knowledge broadened and his compositions improved. So much so that he soon began to attract the attention of a number of patrons and was eventually employed as Kappellmeister by Count Morzin – his first full-time employer.
After four years with Count Morzin, Haydn accepted the position of Vice Kappellmeister with one of the wealthiest and most powerful families in the Austrian empire – the Esterházy’s. He spent nearly thirty years here (having been promoted to Kappellmeister after the death of his predecessor, Gregor Werner) and it was during this period that Haydn wrote some of his most popular and important works. His musical language also changed and matured considerably during this time, gradually moving away from the techniques of the high Baroque and galant style to fully-fledged classicism.
This transition is already marked in the Symphony in E flat Major, ‘The Philosopher’, written just three years after he moved to Esterházy. Formally, the work reflects the leftover strands of the Baroque, with the four-movement plan mirroring the form of the historic sonata da chiesa: a four-movement layout that opens with a slow movement, and in which each movement is in the tonic key. Yet on an internal level the work suggests a move towards the classical style, since each movement is in sonata form – with the exception of the third movement, a minuet and trio, which itself is a classical construct. Haydn plays with this discrepancy of styles throughout the work, alluding to a mysterious and antiquated ‘church’ style in the opening movement through the use of counterpoint, suspensions and imitative textures, before seemingly dispensing with this ‘outmoded’ language in the second movement and setting the symphony off on a new, altogether more contemporary course. It is this thoughtful, provocative mix of styles that appears to have given the symphony its nickname, although Haydn never used it himself.
© Jo Kirkbride
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Chamber Concerto for 13 instruments (1969-70)
The Hungarian György Ligeti (1923-2006) is one the most fascinating and influential composers of the last century. What is most distinctive about his music is his ear for an original colour or texture, and also an approachability which is rare amongst most contemporary composers. His mature style did not emerge until after he escaped to the West in 1956, where he spent time working in the West German Radio Studio creating two ground-breaking electronic compositions. This impacted on his later instrumental works, which often sound electronic because of their innovative approach to texture and timbre. In the 1960s he devised a method of composition called ‘micropolyphony’ which consisted of many canonic layers superimposed on top of each other. This creates a dense web of lines producing a complex, ever-changing texture. Micropolyphony is used in most of Ligeti’s music up to the composition of his opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-78), and is the main technique used in the Chamber Concerto.
The Chamber Concerto was written for the Ensemble ‘die reihe’ and its conductor Friedrich Cerha; the first performance was May 1970 without the final fourth movement which was premiered in October of that year. Each movement has a contrasting sound world, and explores a range of different compositional techniques. One fundamental change in the Chamber Concerto, compared to Ligeti’s preceding music, is from a primarily textural and timbral approach, towards a gradual rediscovery of audible melody.
The first movement starts with a rich tapestry of lines in the woodwind which have a greater characterisation than in Ligeti’s earlier music – these are identifiably melodies although it is hard to hear them individually because of the way they intertwine with each other. The movement unfolds, like many of Ligeti’s micropolyphonic works, through the gradual expansion of the range of pitches used – he creates an expanding pitch wedge. Features in the movement to note are the way the material gradually moves from wind to strings and back; the use of sustained multi-octaves to ‘freeze’ time; and the interruption of a strident melody in the wind towards the end.
The second movement is the slowest of the four, and includes a remarkable section in which all the parts are moving independently at different speeds; a concept that can be seen much earlier in the music of Charles Ives. There are also soloists in this movement - the oboe d’amore the french horn, and the trombone - which take phrases of the surrounding texture and illuminate it into audible expressive melody.
The third movement is an example of Ligeti’s meccanico movements which are inspired by clocks and machines that gradually go ‘out-of-control’. He explores various textures created from repeated single pitches; most of these are moving at different tempi rather like the second movement.
The finale is a technical tour de force for the players (it was not attempted at the first performance in Britain) through its frantic and fast-moving material. Listen out for the incredible breathless duo between the piccolo and bass clarinet, and also for the piano where the directions are ‘hammering like a madman’. This is an uncompromising work which still sounds as fresh now as it did in 1970.
© Mike Searby
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Piano Concerto No 2 in B flat major, Op 83
Allegro non troppo
Allegro e passionato
Andante
Allegretto grazioso
When Brahms announced, in 1881, that he had written "quite a little piano concerto with quite a little tender scherzo ," it would have been obvious to anyone who knew him that something big was about to burst upon the world, no doubt with a turbulent scherzo. His Second Piano Concerto was actually the biggest ever. And yet, for all the heroism he attributes to his solo part, and in spite of the vast scale on which he works, Brahms maintains an almost chamber-music equality between piano and orchestra. In this respect, he remains firmly in the Viennese classical tradition, where he properly belongs.
The piano makes an early entry, in support of the horn and its poetic announcement of the main theme. After a solo cadenza , there is a regular orchestral exposition which presents the theme in a much more vigorous way. Later on in the movement the horn melody is gently recalled in its original poetic form, with the vigourous version being reserved for the coda . This is one way Brahms has of expanding the form. Another, foreshadowed by Mozart and Beethoven, is to award the piano an exposition of its own with a new theme. The orchestra's second theme is then expanded to heroic proportions, culminating in the cascade of trills which here, and in the recapitulation, mark the two main climaxes of the movement.
A work which begins like this is bound to end in serenity. But first it must pass through the turbulence of the "tender little scherzo" in D minor - without which additional movement, incidentally, the work would be shorter than Beethoven's Violin Concerto. The orchestra is liberated in the lyrical beauties of the Andante. Turbulence this time is restricted to the middle section and then, in an inspired passage for piano and two clarinets, luminously clarified before the return of the solo cello and its hymn to serenity.
Just before the end of the Andante, the piano makes a veiled reference to the beginning of the concerto, which is the final psychological preparation for the untroubled happiness of the last movement. This movement is another indication, in both its structure and the character of its main theme, of Brahms's adherence to the Viennese classical tradition. There is a melodically abundant episode in F major and, after a development devoted to the main theme, a quicker and even happier coda.
© Gerald Larner
In this and the concerts on 9 and 10 February, the SCO offers the two mightiest piano concertos of the Romantic age: two pieces which utterly broke the mould. Brahms humorously referred to his concerto as “some little piano pieces” – it is quite the opposite: a symphony for piano and orchestra. Poster returns after his April 2010 debut with Robin Ticciati and the Orchestra.
Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
Symphony No 22 in E flat major, ‘The Philosopher’ (1764)
Adagio
Presto
Minuet e Trio
Finale: Presto
Although Haydn showed clear signs of musical talent from an early age, his path to fame and success was not a smooth one. Neither of his parents could read music and the small town of Rohrau on the Austrian border offered nothing in the way of training for young musical prodigies. With this in mind, his parents accepted an offer from a relative in Hainburg, Johann Matthias Franck, a choirmaster and schoolteacher who proposed to take Haydn into his home as an apprentice and train him as a musician. Although he was just six years old at the time, Haydn never returned to live with his parents; instead, after two years of uncomfortable living in the Franck household, Haydn was taken on as a chorister at St Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna, where he lived for the next nine years. When his voice began to break, however, Haydn was of little use to the choir and he was dismissed from his position, effectively rendered homeless and unemployed overnight.
Fortunately, a family friend allowed Haydn to stay in his home for a short time, and Haydn set about forging a career as a freelance musician. While he spent his days earning his keep as a music teacher and street performer, in his spare time he began honing his composition skills and addressing the topic of music theory, which had so far been lacking in his musical education. Through the painstaking completion of Fux’s counterpoint exercises and the study of music by C.P.E. Bach, Haydn’s musical knowledge broadened and his compositions improved. So much so that he soon began to attract the attention of a number of patrons and was eventually employed as Kappellmeister by Count Morzin – his first full-time employer.
After four years with Count Morzin, Haydn accepted the position of Vice Kappellmeister with one of the wealthiest and most powerful families in the Austrian empire – the Esterházy’s. He spent nearly thirty years here (having been promoted to Kappellmeister after the death of his predecessor, Gregor Werner) and it was during this period that Haydn wrote some of his most popular and important works. His musical language also changed and matured considerably during this time, gradually moving away from the techniques of the high Baroque and galant style to fully-fledged classicism.
This transition is already marked in the Symphony in E flat Major, ‘The Philosopher’, written just three years after he moved to Esterházy. Formally, the work reflects the leftover strands of the Baroque, with the four-movement plan mirroring the form of the historic sonata da chiesa: a four-movement layout that opens with a slow movement, and in which each movement is in the tonic key. Yet on an internal level the work suggests a move towards the classical style, since each movement is in sonata form – with the exception of the third movement, a minuet and trio, which itself is a classical construct. Haydn plays with this discrepancy of styles throughout the work, alluding to a mysterious and antiquated ‘church’ style in the opening movement through the use of counterpoint, suspensions and imitative textures, before seemingly dispensing with this ‘outmoded’ language in the second movement and setting the symphony off on a new, altogether more contemporary course. It is this thoughtful, provocative mix of styles that appears to have given the symphony its nickname, although Haydn never used it himself.
© Jo Kirkbride
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Chamber Concerto for 13 instruments (1969-70)
The Hungarian György Ligeti (1923-2006) is one the most fascinating and influential composers of the last century. What is most distinctive about his music is his ear for an original colour or texture, and also an approachability which is rare amongst most contemporary composers. His mature style did not emerge until after he escaped to the West in 1956, where he spent time working in the West German Radio Studio creating two ground-breaking electronic compositions. This impacted on his later instrumental works, which often sound electronic because of their innovative approach to texture and timbre. In the 1960s he devised a method of composition called ‘micropolyphony’ which consisted of many canonic layers superimposed on top of each other. This creates a dense web of lines producing a complex, ever-changing texture. Micropolyphony is used in most of Ligeti’s music up to the composition of his opera Le Grand Macabre (1974-78), and is the main technique used in the Chamber Concerto.
The Chamber Concerto was written for the Ensemble ‘die reihe’ and its conductor Friedrich Cerha; the first performance was May 1970 without the final fourth movement which was premiered in October of that year. Each movement has a contrasting sound world, and explores a range of different compositional techniques. One fundamental change in the Chamber Concerto, compared to Ligeti’s preceding music, is from a primarily textural and timbral approach, towards a gradual rediscovery of audible melody.
The first movement starts with a rich tapestry of lines in the woodwind which have a greater characterisation than in Ligeti’s earlier music – these are identifiably melodies although it is hard to hear them individually because of the way they intertwine with each other. The movement unfolds, like many of Ligeti’s micropolyphonic works, through the gradual expansion of the range of pitches used – he creates an expanding pitch wedge. Features in the movement to note are the way the material gradually moves from wind to strings and back; the use of sustained multi-octaves to ‘freeze’ time; and the interruption of a strident melody in the wind towards the end.
The second movement is the slowest of the four, and includes a remarkable section in which all the parts are moving independently at different speeds; a concept that can be seen much earlier in the music of Charles Ives. There are also soloists in this movement - the oboe d’amore the french horn, and the trombone - which take phrases of the surrounding texture and illuminate it into audible expressive melody.
The third movement is an example of Ligeti’s meccanico movements which are inspired by clocks and machines that gradually go ‘out-of-control’. He explores various textures created from repeated single pitches; most of these are moving at different tempi rather like the second movement.
The finale is a technical tour de force for the players (it was not attempted at the first performance in Britain) through its frantic and fast-moving material. Listen out for the incredible breathless duo between the piccolo and bass clarinet, and also for the piano where the directions are ‘hammering like a madman’. This is an uncompromising work which still sounds as fresh now as it did in 1970.
© Mike Searby
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Piano Concerto No 2 in B flat major, Op 83
Allegro non troppo
Allegro e passionato
Andante
Allegretto grazioso
When Brahms announced, in 1881, that he had written "quite a little piano concerto with quite a little tender scherzo ," it would have been obvious to anyone who knew him that something big was about to burst upon the world, no doubt with a turbulent scherzo. His Second Piano Concerto was actually the biggest ever. And yet, for all the heroism he attributes to his solo part, and in spite of the vast scale on which he works, Brahms maintains an almost chamber-music equality between piano and orchestra. In this respect, he remains firmly in the Viennese classical tradition, where he properly belongs.
The piano makes an early entry, in support of the horn and its poetic announcement of the main theme. After a solo cadenza , there is a regular orchestral exposition which presents the theme in a much more vigorous way. Later on in the movement the horn melody is gently recalled in its original poetic form, with the vigourous version being reserved for the coda . This is one way Brahms has of expanding the form. Another, foreshadowed by Mozart and Beethoven, is to award the piano an exposition of its own with a new theme. The orchestra's second theme is then expanded to heroic proportions, culminating in the cascade of trills which here, and in the recapitulation, mark the two main climaxes of the movement.
A work which begins like this is bound to end in serenity. But first it must pass through the turbulence of the "tender little scherzo" in D minor - without which additional movement, incidentally, the work would be shorter than Beethoven's Violin Concerto. The orchestra is liberated in the lyrical beauties of the Andante. Turbulence this time is restricted to the middle section and then, in an inspired passage for piano and two clarinets, luminously clarified before the return of the solo cello and its hymn to serenity.
Just before the end of the Andante, the piano makes a veiled reference to the beginning of the concerto, which is the final psychological preparation for the untroubled happiness of the last movement. This movement is another indication, in both its structure and the character of its main theme, of Brahms's adherence to the Viennese classical tradition. There is a melodically abundant episode in F major and, after a development devoted to the main theme, a quicker and even happier coda.
© Gerald Larner
In this and the concerts on 9 and 10 February, the SCO offers the two mightiest piano concertos of the Romantic age: two pieces which utterly broke the mould. Brahms humorously referred to his concerto as “some little piano pieces” – it is quite the opposite: a symphony for piano and orchestra. Poster returns after his April 2010 debut with Robin Ticciati and the Orchestra.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
