Robert Schumann (1810-1856)
Overture to Genoveva, Op 81
Like Schubert before him, Schumann had great hopes of establishing himself as an opera composer, and of furthering the cause of German Romantic opera in particular. During his career he considered a number of possible operatic projects, including Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Faust and, in an intriguing anticipation of Wagner, the Niebelungen Lied and Tristan and Isolde.
In the end Genoveva, written between 1847 and 1848, was the only opera he completed. The libretto is largely by Schumann himself, after disagreement with his original librettist. The eighth-century legend on which it is based concerns Genoveva, the wife of Count Siegfried of Brabant. While he is away fighting the Saracens, she resists the lecherous advances of his steward Golo, who, in revenge, falsely accuses her of adultery. She is condemned to death, but Siegfried learns the truth just in time to save her from execution.
Unlike many opera composers, who left the overture till last, Schumann sketched his - in a matter of three days in April 1847 - before he had even begun detailed work on the libretto. It was successfully performed during a concert tour to Bremen and Hamburg which Schumann and his wife, Clara, undertook in February and March 1850. After a series of delays the opera was eventually staged in Leipzig in June of that year. Schumann conducted three performances, but though it was generally well received by the audience, it was not the success he had been hoping for. And though it was staged in a number of other German cities (Liszt conducted a performance in Weimar in 1855) as well as St Petersburg, Paris and London, it has never established more than a marginal place in the operatic repertory.
The overture, though, is a fine work in its own right. The tense introduction, suggesting both Genoveva’s anguish and Golo’s malevolence, leads to an agitated Allegro with a heroic secondary theme for the horns, and a triumphant ending anticipating the drama’s eventual outcome.
© Mike Wheeler
Berlioz (1803-1869)
Tristia (1852)
1. Méditation religieuse
2. La mort d’Ophélie
3. Marche funèbre pour la dernière scène d’Hamlet
Tristia (‘sad things’) was the title under which Berlioz published these three separately composed pieces of tragic or elegiac character – Nos. 1 and 2 first with piano accompaniment, all three in full score in 1852. No.3, the Hamlet march, was written in 1844 for a Paris production of the play which was then cancelled. Four years later, when Berlioz was in London, there was talk of a musical Shakespeare night at Covent Garden, but that too failed to materialise. He never heard any of them.
The Thomas Moore-inspired Religious Meditation was composed in Rome in August 1831 for mixed chorus and seven wind instruments. Much later, strings were added. They play mostly in octaves, their sighing phrases punctuating the gently pulsating chords of woodwind and horns. The downward curve of the melodic lines evokes nostalgia and regret, intensified in the final bars as the solo horn’s melancholy E flat sounds across the just-audible G major of muted strings – image of the poem’s ‘fading light on Glory’s plumes’.
In its original voice-and-piano form The Death of Ophelia, a setting of Ernest Legouvé’s paraphrase of the Queen’s speech in Act 4 of Hamlet, dates from May 1842, about a year after the completion of the song-cycle Les nuits d’été. By then Berlioz’s marriage to the Shakespearean actress Harriet Smithson, the Ophelia he had fallen in love with fifteen years before, was in ruins. The song, with its reminiscence of the Symphonie Fantastique’s motto theme – Harriet’s theme – in the opening bars, is surely a lament for that love. In 1848, for the projected Shakespeare evening at Covent Garden, he scored it for a small orchestra of muted strings, horns, and soft-grained woodwind sonorities – flutes, clarinets and cor anglais, but no oboes or bassoons – and rewrote the solo vocal line as a two-part women’s chorus, transposing it down a tone to A flat major. The musical outline is based on the poem’s four-verse structure, but the strophic shape is constantly modified to create a single flowing continuum, in which the melody and its sad, swaying refrain (on ‘Ah’) are never exactly the same. A subdued dynamic level is established by the strings’ murmuring semiquavers, suggesting the brook along which the mad Ophelia wanders. Only twice does it rise to forte: once when the branch of the willow breaks and she falls into the stream, and again when the weight of her dress ‘pulls the poor wretch to muddy death’, leaving her song to sink down after her in a long diminuendo.
The sombre Hamlet march must also have had echoes in Berlioz’s life. At the prospect of seeing the play again he wept in the street, ‘thinking of Hamlet, of Ophelia, of all that is no more, of all that has become like poor Yorick’. By the time he wrote out the revised full score in 1848, the death of his father had added another layer of meaning to what Hugh Macdonald describes as the composer’s ‘ultimate funeral utterance’ – Berlioz’s response (in his own words) to the play’s tragic sense of ‘the nothingness of life, the vanity of human designs, the tyranny of chance, the indifference of fate or God to what we call virtue, vice, beauty, ugliness, love, hate, genius, stupidity’. The March, in a bleak, harsh A minor and scored for large orchestra and wordless chorus, is dominated by an implacable rhythm (the same as in the A minor second movement of Beethoven’s seventh symphony and in many works of Schubert). The last few lines of the play are reproduced at the head of the score, ending with ‘Go, bid the soldiers shoot’, and at the climax of the march there is a rattle of percussion suggestive of a volley of musketry (to which the score, following Shakespeare’s stage directions, adds ‘a peal of ordnance’). The music then breaks off, and in the silence we hear isolated double-bass notes, violin phrases groping in the void, bare woodwind octaves, falling and intertwining chromatic lines (a feature of the piece), soft gong strokes and, finally, above a kind of groan in the orchestra, the tap of muffled side-drums as the cortege moves away, leaving the voices’ wordless cry imprinted on the empty air.
© David Cairns
Hector Berlioz (1803–69)
Symphonie fantastique (1830–32)
1 Daydreams – Passions: Largo – Allegro agitato e appassionato assai
2 A Ball. Waltz: Allegro non troppo
3 Scene in the fields: Adagio
4 March to the Scaffold: Allegretto non troppo
5 Dream of a Witches’ Sabbath: Larghetto – Allegro
With all its innovations – including the introduction of instruments, textures and rhythms new to symphonic music – the Symphonie Fantastique has its roots in other music, past and present: not least the music of Gluck and Spontini, which was for several years Berlioz’s main diet and whose melodic style he absorbed into his innermost being when he first came to Paris in 1821, a boy of 17 who had never heard an orchestra. A few years later, the discovery of Weber, and still more of Beethoven at the Conservatoire concerts in 1828 (paralleling that of Goethe and Shakespeare) had an even more profound effect on the young musician till then reared on French classical opera. The Fantastique is unthinkable without Beethoven’s Pastoral and Fifth, and without Der Fresichütz. Above all, the revelation of the symphony as a dramatic form par excellence, and of the orchestra as an expressive instrument of undreamed of richness and flexibility, opened before him a new world which he must at all costs enter and inhabit.
It became the springboard for a leap into unknown territory. The influence of Beethoven could only be general, not specific; it was a matter of inspiration, not imitation. So, though Berlioz is deeply concerned with issues of musical architecture, he works out his own salvation. Though he will learn from Beethoven’s technique of thematic transformation, he will not use him as a model. He composes in melodic spans rather than in motifs. The work’s recurring melody – the idée fixe – is forty bars long; and its repetition two thirds of the way through the first movement represents not a sonata reprise but a stage in the theme’s evolution from monody to full orchestral statement.
No one had composed symphonic music or used the orchestra like this before. As Michael Steinberg says, ‘no disrespect to Mahler or Shostakovich, but this is the most remarkable First Symphony ever written’. It was typical of Berlioz’s boldness and freedom of spirit that his first major orchestral work comprised a mixture of genres analogous to what the Romantic dramatists were attempting after the example of Shakespeare – bringing the theatre into the concert hall - and that in doing so he should override the normal categories of symphonic discourse and create his own idiosyncratic version of classical form in response to the demands of the musical drama: the ‘Episode in the Life of an Artist’ that is the work’s subtitle.
Yet the score given at the Conservatoire Hall in December 1830 was, to him, a logical consequence of the Beethovenian epiphany that he had had two years earlier in the same hall. It was addressed to the same eager young public and performed by many of the same players, under the same conductor, François Antoine Habeneck.
It might embody autobiographical elements: not just his much publicised passion for the Shakespearean actress Harriet Smithson, but his whole emotional and spiritual existence up till then – as he wrote at the front of the manuscript, quoting a poem by Victor Hugo, ‘All I have suffered, all I have attempted … The loves, the labours, the bereavements of my youth… my heart’s book inscribed on every page’. For Berlioz, however, all this was not essentially different from what Beethoven had done in his Fifth and Sixth symphonies. Carrying on from him, he could use intense personal experience, and movement titles, to bring music’s inherent expressivity still further into the open and at the same time extend its frame of reference and blur still more the distinction between so-called ‘pure music’ and music associated with an identifiable human situation. All sorts of extra-musical ideas could go into the composition, yet music remained sovereign. It could describe the course of one man’s hopeless passion for a distant beloved and still be - as Beethoven said of the ’Pastoral’ - ‘expression of feeling rather than painting’, the whole contained within a disciplined musical structure.
The literary ‘programme’ offered to the Conservatoire audience gave the context of the work; it introduced the ‘instrumental drama’ (to quote Berlioz’s prefatory note) whose ‘outline, lacking the assistance of speech, needs to be explained in advance’. It is not this that holds the symphony together and makes it a timeless record of the ardours and torments of the young imagination. The music does that.
The five movements may be summed up as follows:
1 Slow introduction; sadness and imagined happiness, creating out of a state of yearning an image of the ideal woman, represented (Allegro) by the idée fixe – a long, asymmetrically phrased melodic span, first heard virtually unaccompanied, then gradually integrated into the full orchestra. The melody, in its alternate exaltation and dejection, its fevers and momentary calms, forms the main argument. At the end, like a storm that has blown itself out, it comes to rest on a series of solemn chords.
2 A ball, at which the beloved is present. Waltz, at first dreamlike, then glittering, finally garish. Middle section with the idée fixe assimilated to the rhythm of the dance.
3 A shepherd pipes a melancholy song, answered from afar by another. Pastoral scene: a long, serene melody, with similarities of outline to the idée fixe and, like it, presented as monody, by flute and first violins, then in progressively fuller textures. Agitated climax, precipitated by the idée fixe, which later takes on a more tranquil air (without its characteristic sighing fourth). Dusk, distant storm. The first shepherd now pipes alone. Drums and solo horn prepare for:
4 March to the Scaffold. The artist imagines he has killed the beloved and is being marched through the streets to execution. The dreams of the first three movements are now intensified into nightmare and the full orchestral forces deployed: massive brass and percussion, prominent and grotesque bassoons. The idée fixe reappears pianissimo on solo clarinet, but is cut off by the guillotine stroke of the whole orchestra.
5 Strange mewings, muffled explosions, distant cries. The executed lover witnesses his own funeral. The beloved melody, now a lewd distortion of itself, joins the revels. ‘Dies irae’, parody of the church’s ritual of the dead. Witches’ round dance. The climax, after a long crescendo, combines round dance and ‘Dies irae’ in a tour de force of rhythmic and orchestral virtuosity.
© David Cairns
Principal Conductor Robin Ticciati opens the Season. In his own words: “Berlioz’s masterwork Symphonie Fantastique is most commonly associated with the symphony orchestra, but I am extremely excited by the prospect of playing it with the SCO as our opening concert of this new Season. It represents a natural continuation of our Berlioz journey which began with La Mort de Cléopâtre and L’Enfance du Christ. I am hoping that with a rigorous attention to phrasing, articulation, the colour of dissonance and classical and early romantic style, we will enter into this world of goblins, frenzied passion and loneliness and offer you a thought-provoking and new way of listening to the piece. Join us for the next leg of the journey!”
Sponsored by:
![]()

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
