Juan Crisostomo Arriaga (1806-1826)
Overture, Los esclavos felices (1820)
Juan Crisostomo Jacobo Antonio de Arriaga y Balzola, a composer whose life was as short as his name was long, was one of the great might-have-beens of early nineteenth-century music. Born in Bilbao on what would have been Mozart’s fiftieth birthday, he was dubbed “the Spanish Mozart” on the strength of his similar precocity. He was doomed, however, to die even younger, before the floodgates of his inspiration had fully opened.
But if his output was much more sparse, it was of the choicest quality. A symphony, three string quartets, a one-act opera seria and a spot of sacred music were about all it amounted to, whereas Mozart by the same age had already produced more than two hundred catalogued works, including his five violin concertos, his first 29 symphonies and nine operas. As for Mendelssohn, hailed by Charles Rosen as “the greatest child prodigy the history of Western music has ever known,” his teenage Octet and Midsummer Night’s Dream overture surely surpass anything even Mozart produced in his brilliant adolescence.
Yet Arriaga’s achievement, in its smaller way, was also something special. Encouraged (like Mozart) by his father, who promoted him as a violinist, he started composing when he was eleven. At fifteen he went to Paris where he became a pupil of Fetis, the distinguished Belgian pedagogue, and was championed by Cherubini. His symphony and quartets were filled with Schubertian promise, their ideas pregnant, their structure strong, their technique polished to perfection. Who could fail to recognise them as works of early genius? But by nineteen, by which time he had become tubercular, he was dead.
His overture to Los esclavos felices (The Felicitous Slaves) shows Rossinian leanings, the charm of its slow introduction leading to the wittiest of allegros, packed with piquant woodwind prattle and even, at the end, a Rossini crescendo. Yet the music, for all its exuberance, prefaces an opera as serious in intent as the description 'opera seria' gives reason to expect. The story concerns a Spanish aristocrat and his wife who are captured by Moors and threatened with death before being released by the magnanimous King of Algeria. But the overture - in the manner of Schubert’s overtures in the Italian style (music Arriaga could never have known) - urges us not to treat the opera too seriously. Out of potential tragedy, it seems, comedy can come.
© Conrad Wilson
Samuel Barber (1910-1981)
Canzonetta for oboe and strings (1978)
Samuel Barber’s Adagio for Strings is the great American threnody. Originally written as the slow movement of a string quartet, it established itself as a full-blown statement of public grief after Toscanini, during the Second World War, had championed it in a very slow version for large string orchestra. But the Canzonetta for oboe and strings - the slow movement of an oboe concerto left unfinished at the time of the composer’s death - is elegiac also, though in a quieter, more private way, with fewer overtones of Elgar’s Nimrod, of which the Adagio for Strings has come to seem the American equivalent.
The music - Barber’s last composition - was written in short score in 1978 before being put into full score by his pupil Charles Turner and given the posthumous title of Canzonetta, a word for a brief lyrical song of Italian origin. Standing on its own feet, it exploits a vein of pastoral melancholy of a sort which an English critic, reviewing a work by Vaughan Williams, once categorised as that of “the sound of an oboe with strings in the background.”
But the sound, in this case, also possesses some of the universal ruefulness of Mahler, whose famous Adagietto is inevitably evoked by the slow unfurling of Barber’s instrumental strands. The first performance, by Zubin Mehta and the New York Philharmonic with Harold Gomberg as soloist, was hailed by the New Yorker magazine as “graceful, passionate, poetic.” Though it is a slight piece, the words are apt. Barber, one of the leading American composers of his time, produced works in all the established musical forms, marked by a continuous sense of lyricism that permeates the calm melodic interplay of this valedictory canzonetta.
© Conrad Wilson
Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847)
Symphony No 4 in A major, Op 90, 'Italian' (1833)
Allegro vivace
Andante con moto
Con moto moderato
Saltarello: Presto
The prim young Mendelssohn had no time for the audacious Berlioz’s music, dismissing the counterpoint as "barbarous" and the orchestration as "so messy and slapdash that you want to wash your hands after going through one of his works." Berlioz, on the other hand, had plenty of time for Mendelssohn, admiring the finesse of Fingal’s Cave and conducting the Italian Symphony with such mastery that the music critic of The Times declared every tempo had been gauged to perfection for the first time in his experience. Both composers, as it happened, were superb conductors, and on one occasion exchanged batons as tokens of mutual esteem, Berlioz admitting that his "heavy oak cudgel" hardly bore comparison with Mendelssohn’s "sceptre."
Yet Berlioz’s admiration for Mendelssohn’s Italian Symphony did not just lie in his ability to conduct it. The music - or at any rate its inspiration - dated from the Italian period in both their lives, when Mendelssohn, at the age of 21, was on his second grand tour of Europe, and Berlioz, at 28, had won the Prix de Rome which resulted in his truculent sojourn in the Eternal City. Mendelssohn, more enthusiastically responsive to Italy, savoured the "supreme delight in life" displayed by the Italians, and on reaching Rome - where he first encountered Berlioz, disgruntled as ever with the atmosphere of the "odious" Caffé Greco (today packed with Japanese tourists) near the Spanish Steps - he vowed to write an Italian symphony in tribute to the vivacity of the people. Yet, as with Berlioz and his Harold in Italy, he finally produced a work more symphonic than descriptive. Otherwise, he suspected, listeners might mistake his efforts for just another piece of nineteenth-century musical landscape painting, which was far from his intention.
Be that as it may, the Italian features of Mendelssohn’s Symphony No 4 are unmistakable and remain part of its charm, just as the Italian side of Harold in Italy is one of its poetic pleasures. By the time of the Italian Symphony’s first performance, which Mendelssohn himself conducted in London in 1833, the symphonic and the picturesque aspects of the music had wholly gelled, just as they were also to do in Berlioz’s masterpiece, completed the following year. The similarity between their slow movements – Mendelssohn’s a sort of pilgrims’ march, Berlioz’s actually entitled Pilgrims’ March - is not their only shared feature, though it is certainly the most striking one.
But while the four movements of Berlioz’s symphony are unquestionably Byronic in mood, those of Mendelssohn’s are less specific. Though the theory that his Scotch Symphony was really his Italian, and vice versa, no longer cuts much ice, there seems little doubt that the slow movement of the Italian has nothing to do with Italy but was intended to commemorate Goethe and Zelter (Mendelssohn’s teacher, one of whose works it quotes), both of whom had died in 1832. What the Scotch and Italian symphonies do quite curiously have in common are aspects of the key of A, the Scotch beginning in A minor and ending in A major, the Italian beginning in A major and ending in A minor. In this respect the one work could be called the obverse of the other, though to what extent this was intentional is hard to say.
What is easier to identify is the sunniness of the first movement of the Italian - something in no sense Scottish - and the Mediterranean swirl of the finale, which Mendelssohn took pains to entitle Saltarello, in tribute to the leaping Italian dance relentlessly evoked by the music. In comparison the slow movement heads in a different direction, its inspiration being the allegretto of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony, another study in the relationship between A minor and A major. As for the elfin grace of the third movement - a Mendelssohnian evocation of a classical minuet - its poetic central section, filled with magical horn calls, could easily come from A Midsummer Night’s Dream.
© Conrad Wilson
The SCO opens the 2011 Lammermuir Festival with a delightful programme featuring much-loved masterpieces by Mozart and Mendelssohn. Brilliant SCO Principal Clarinet, Maximiliano Martín performs Mozart's Clarinet Concerto. Alongside these, a charming overture by Arriaga – the ‘Spanish Mozart’ – and a short piece by Samuel Barber, composed at the end of his life not long before his final stay with his lifelong friend Menotti at Yester House in East Lothian.
SCO Principal Clarinet Maximiliano Martín performs Mozart's Clarinet Concerto in A. This excerpt comes from the SCO's Mozart Wind Concertos disc which also features the Bassoon Concerto in B flat and the Flute Concerto in G. It is available to buy from the SCO Online Shop.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
