Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
Symphony no 94 in G ‘Surprise’ (1792)
Adagio – vivace assai
Andante
Menuet. Allegro molto
Finale. Allegro di molto
Haydn’s two visits to London in 1791 and 1794 were the greatest triumphs of his career so far. Both professionally and socially he was the centre of considerable attention and he lapped up a wealth of new experiences, not least that of seeing his music acclaimed by a large and enthusiastic public. As he wrote to his friend Maria von Genzinger in January 1791, “My arrival caused a great sensation throughout the whole city, and I went the round of all the newspapers for 3 successive days. Everyone wants to know me”. The contrast with years of serving the Esterházy family in relative obscurity must have been overwhelming.
Haydn composed his last twelve symphonies for his two visits, and they have since become known collectively as his ‘London’ Symphonies. No 94, one of the group written for his first visit, was given its premiere in March 1792. Like all but one of the ‘London’ symphonies it opens with a slow introduction, though this one is shorter and quieter than most; the gentle opening for oboes and bassoons was quite a novelty at the time. The main part of the movement then races off with a freshness and sparkle which surely reflect the personal youthful vigour with which the 60-year-old composer astonished his London hosts.
Just how close Haydn’s melodic style was to the traditional peasant music of the region he grew up in is nowhere better demonstrated than by the artless simplicity of the andante’s opening tune (he was even able to re-use it, quite plausibly, in ‘Spring’ from his oratorio The seasons, as the tune whistled by Simon the farmer as he goes ploughing). It is the basis for an extraordinarily inventive set of variations. Contrary to popular legend the sudden fortissimo which gives the symphony its English nickname was not designed to wake the audience up (in any case, it was an afterthought on Haydn’s part). Haydn told his first biographer that it was due to the rivalry with his pupil Ignaz Pleyel, who was also having his work performed in London at the time, and whose presence spurred Haydn to outdo him in brilliant orchestral effects.
The minuet (so-called) is actually one of Haydn’s earthiest peasant dances, with springy, resilient rhythms, robust good humour and, where necessary, moments of elegance. The finale outdoes even the first movement for exuberant vitality, racing along madly through one change of key after another and ending the symphony in that spirit of gracious ebullience of which Haydn alone seemed to know the secret.
© Mike Wheeler
Karol Szymanowski (1882-1937)
Violin Concerto No 2, Op 61
Moderato, molto tranquillo — allegramente, molto energico — andantino, molto tranquillo — tempo I.
Like his First Violin Concerto and the three Mythes for violin and piano, Szymanowski’s Violin Concerto No 2 owes its existence to the composer’s friendship with the violinist Paweł Kochański. Kochański had settled in the USA in the early 1920s but visited Poland in August 1932 and, as Szymanowski put it, in a letter to another friend, he “squeezed out of me, as out of a dessicated tube of toothpaste, believe it or not – a new violin concerto!!”
The two men worked closely together, particularly on the violin part, as they had done back in 1915 on Mythes. Kochánski was the soloist at the first performance, in Warsaw in October 1933, even though he was already suffering from the cancer from which he was to die three months later. When the score was published Szymanowski added a dedication (in French): “To the memory of the Great Musician, my dear and unforgettable Friend, Paul Kochański.”
Like Violin Concerto No 1, the Second is in one continuous movement, but the similarity ends there. Composed in two different periods of the composer’s career, they reflect different expressive priorities. No 1, from 1916, dates from the time when Szymanowski’s absorption in Eastern cultures was at its height, reflected in the atmosphere of heady exoticism that marks so much of his music from that decade. By the time of the Second, he had moved on, through his growing interest in Polish folk music, especially from the southern Tatra Mountain region. This was the main stimulus to his creativity in the last ten years or so of his career, though by the time of the concerto he no longer simply borrowed existing folk music material and instead absorbed its characteristics into his own style.
The work falls into two main sections, linked by the solo cadenza that Kochański composed at Szymanowski’s invitation. It opens with a long, seemingly endlessly inventive theme for the solo violin, containing three distinct melodic ideas that form the basis for the concerto’s first main section. It is in the second half, particularly, that the folk-music influence can be heard, particularly in its incisive rhythmic language, and in which Szymanowski’s musical world comes closest to that of Bartók.
© Mike Wheeler
Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971)
Orpheus (1947)
Down the ages, pagans, Christians and humanists, poets, painters, musicians and filmmakers have all been moved by the story of Orpheus. His journey to the underworld to attempt to retrieve his lover Eurydice has been the paradigm for all manner of symbolic quest narratives, from Dante’s The Divine Comedy and Monteverdi’s Orfeo, to Mozart’s The Magic Flute and Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge! In each case the familiar story is refashioned in the image of its own age, with renewed relevance; each age has reclaimed Orpheus for itself. Across 3000 years of history there is hardly a generation that has been untouched by Orpheus’ songs of loss and lament.
The terrible and unnecessary deaths of the youthful Orpheus and Eurydice took on particular resonance in the violent 20th century. It is telling that Stravinsky chose Orpheus as the subject for his ballet begun within a year of the end of the Second World War. Orpheus (following Apollon musagète and Persephone) is the last of a trio of ballets on Greek myths written over a period of twenty years, and is the most stylized of the three. Exiled for a second time in America, Stravinsky experienced the terrors and privations of the War only at a distance; indeed, it is a sense of distance – from the story’s violence, from overt emotion – that in general characterizes this work. With the close collaboration of choreographer George Balanchine, whose initial idea it was to use Orpheus as the subject, Stravinsky worked out a scenario that starts with Orpheus weeping at Eurydice’s funeral and ends with Orpheus’ apotheosis where Apollo appears, "wrests the lyre from Orpheus and raises his son heavenwards". The music throughout is restrained, distanced. The sense of formality is reinforced by, among other things, the chorale-like frame of prologue and epilogue, and the importance throughout of counterpoint. The designer chosen for the premiere production was Isamu Noguchi, a sculptor whose abstract geometric sets, costumes and masks perfectly matched the distilled purity of Stravinsky’s music and Balanchine’s dances.
The apparent turning away from violence in Orpheus is not a sign of retreat from the horror of the War. In the face of such slaughter, not least in the far-away country of Stravinsky’s birth, another barbaric Rite of Spring would hardly have been possible. The only violent music in Orpheus is the ‘Pas d’action’, where the ‘Bacchantes attack Orpheus, seize him and tear him to pieces’, but even here the music is disciplined. Like other archetypical neoclassical works of the war years, such as the Symphony in C and the Symphony in Three Movements, Orpheus offers "timely reflections on war and death", to appropriate Freud’s phrase of 1915, but with a sense of detachment. Stravinsky’s Orpheus is imbued with a melancholic world-weariness. Alienation, memory and mourning are its defining features. This is captured poignantly in the ballet’s opening. "Orpheus weeps for Eurydice. He stands motionless, with his back to the audience." The falling, lamenting, Phrygian lines of Orpheus’s lyre (harp) are both ancient and modern; they speak directly of loss.
© Jonathan Cross
The story of Haydn lulling an unsuspecting audience to sleep with his gentle slow movement then jolting them awake with a loud ‘SURPRISE’ chord is probably too good to be true, but that does not diminish the piece’s charms. In Orpheus Stravinsky looks back to the earliest days of opera for inspiration, and draws on the brilliance of Monteverdi’s world to tell his own version of the myth.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
