Joseph Haydn (1732 – 1809)
Scena di Berenice (H.XVIIa:10)
Haydn’s compositions for his two triumphant visits to London included not only his last twelve symphonies, but also an opera and a number of smaller pieces both for instruments and for voice. Among them is this Scena, one of his finest vocal works, which was first performed at his final benefit concert on 4 May 1795. (The so-called London Symphony, No 104, had its premiere in the same programme.) The piece was written for the celebrated prima donna Brigida Giorgi Banti, and her performance at the concert was generally admired – though Haydn wrote in his diary, in his delightful English (or perhaps recording a London witticism), that Signora Banti had sung ‘very scanty’.
The Scena di Berenice is a large-scale operatic scene, with a brilliant solo part, and a prominent role for the wind section of flute, oboes, clarinets, bassoons and horns in the accompanying orchestra. A striking and forward-looking feature of the work is its lack of a consistent key-centre, reflecting the heroine’s increasingly distracted state of mind. The opening recitative roves restlessly from key to key, though at Aspetta, anima bella it settles for a moment in C major for an oboe and bassoon melody of Gluck-like calm. The slow first aria, Non partir, bell’idol mio, in E major, breaks off for a further passage of recitative, leading to the fiery concluding aria, Perchè, se tanti siete, in F minor.
The text is from Antigono, by the great librettist of baroque opera, Pietro Metastasio. The heroine, Berenice, has fallen in love with Demetrius, the son (by a previous marriage) of her husband Antigonus. Demetrius has decided to abandon Berenice and commit suicide, rather than dishonour the family name. Berenice struggles with her conflicting emotions, imagines her lover departing for the underworld, and calls on the gods to bring her life to an end.
© Anthony Burton
Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971)
Apollon musagète (1927-8)
One of Stravinsky’s earliest so-called ‘neoclassical’ works written in the aftermath of the First World War was the ballet Pulcinella, commissioned by the impresario Sergey Diaghilev for the Ballets Russes, the company that had first brought Stravinsky to international fame with Firebird. Pulcinella was Stravinsky’s discovery of the past, as he later described it, "the epiphany through which the whole of my late work became possible. It was a backward look, of course – the first of many love affairs in that direction – but it was a look in the mirror, too." Despite its dependence on the music of the past, Pulcinella represents an important turning point in Stravinsky’s artistic development. It revealed to him the possibilities of an engagement with all kinds of earlier music in order to renew his own musical language. Crucial, though, for his neoclassical music was not the material he borrowed (which could come from anywhere) but his attitude to it. Everything he touched he made his own.
If Pulcinella was the epiphany, then Apollon musagète must surely be the apogee of Stravinsky’s neoclassicism. Commissioned by the American patron Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge in 1927, Stravinsky chose, as he explains in his autobiography, "to compose a ballet founded on moments or episodes in Greek mythology plastically interpreted by dancing of the so-called classical school". He wanted to create what he termed a 'ballet blanc’, a score of great purity and unity, in which violent contrasts were avoided and all elements were pared down to their simplest. Hence it is scored for strings alone and makes almost exclusive use of diatonic harmony (the equivalent of the ‘white notes’ on the piano keyboard). For George Balanchine, choreographer of the 1928 European premiere, the work was a revelation: "In its discipline and restraint, in its sustained oneness of tone and feeling… [Apollon] seemed to tell me that I could dare not to use everything, that I, too, could eliminate". The result was the perfect union of music and dance in the expression of pure, classical beauty.
In order to achieve this sense of order as symbolized by the Greek god Apollo, Stravinsky turned to poetry. Each dance explores a basic iambic (short–long) pattern, while the ‘Variation of Calliope’ (the muse of poetry) is headed by two lines from Boileau and takes the twelve-syllable lines of the alexandrine as its rhythmic model. Another means of order was achieved by alluding to the stateliness of French Baroque dances, such as the ouverture style of the opening ‘Birth of Apollo’ or the pavane-like second ‘Variation of Apollo’. The closing ‘Apotheosis’, in which Apollo leads the three Muses towards Parnassus, brings together the various rhythmic elements of the work in music that is not just serenely beautiful but also seems to speak of something deeper and darker, something beyond reason and order. Stravinsky looks back to ancient Greece but is ultimately, perhaps, only able to see the reflection of his own tragic age.
© Jonathan Cross
Gabriel Fauré (1845-1924)
Seven Songs arranged for voice and orchestra by Colin Matthews (b 1946)
first performance
Fleur jetée Op.39 No.2 (1884)
Nocturne Op.43 No.2 (1886)
Mandoline Op.58 No.1 (1891)
Clair de lune (Menuet) Op.46 No.2 (1887)
Notre amour Op.23 No.2 (1879)
Green Op.58 No.3 (1891)
Les berceaux Op.23 No.1 (1879) –
Postlude
Colin Matthews’s extraordinay accomplishment as a composer derives in no small way from the active interest he has always taken in the music of others – from his early collaboration with Deryck Cooke in completing a performing version of Mahler’s unfinished Tenth Symphony and his work as assistant to Benjamin Britten to his recent masterly orchestration of Debussy’s 24 piano Preludes. Even so, in spite of the experience he has in this area, including a version for mezzo-soprano and chamber orchestra of Debussy’s Trois Poèmes de Stéphane Mallarmé, creating orchestral arrangements of Fauré songs cannot have been easy. The peculiarly intimate relationship between voice and piano characteristic of most of the best of Fauré’s mélodies is a quality that, as far as we know, the composer himself never attempted to translate into another medium.
Fleur jetée, the opening item in the selection made by Colin Matthews and Robin Ticciati, is peculiar among Fauré’s hundred or so songs for the violence of its expression, the insistently repeated semiquavers and the surging bass calling Schubert’s Erlkönig to mind. The trumpet crescendo and the rumbling of bassoons and lower strings at the beginning of the first and third stanzas of the Matthews version and the occasional doubling of the vocal line by solo woodwind reflect the intensity of the poet’s bitterness without exaggerating it. Nocturne is a more characteristic inspiration, a dialogue between the voice and the right hand of the piano, the latter sensitively represented here by, in turn, solo oboe, horn, flute and piccolo in each of the three stanzas.
As Matthews himself has observed, the plucked strings of the third song, Mandoline, are implicit in Verlaine’s text, just as it is immediately clear, he says “that wooodwind should carry all the melody” in the setting of the same poet’s Clair de lune. It is worth noting, however, the delicacy of the woodwind reactions to the decorative element in the vocal line of Mandoline and the part played by the harp in echoing the sound of the lute carried by the masquers and bergamaskers in Clair de lune.
The triplet rhythms that sustain the momentum of Notre amour are confined in the original to the central register of the piano. In this version they are entrusted to the two clarinets until, at the climax of the song, they are transferred with a decisive change of colour to the harp. The eloquent left-hand counterpoint to the voice is carried by the cellos with occasional support from the bassoons, while the tiny interlude between the fourth and fifth stanzas is presented by unison flutes and oboes over bassoon arpeggios. Fascinated by Fauré’s paradoxical remarks on Green – which should be “slow moving” and yet “lively, passionate, almost out of breath” – Matthews prescribes Fauré’s Allegretto con moto tempo direction but steadies it by taking a three-note figure scarcely noticeable in the piano part of the original and presenting it on its several appearances as a tender exchange between clarinet and horn.
One of the more remarkable aspects of the original version of Les berceaux is its economical, basically two-line accompaniment shared between left hand and right, each with its own rhythmic pattern. Feeling perhaps that literally translated it would seem thin in orchestral terms, Matthews has enriched the texture in several ways: he consigns Fauré’s accompaniment mainly to clarinet and bass clarinet but varies its colouring and at the same time discreetly adds new material, like that of the flute line anticipating in the opening bars a phrase to come later in the work. He also doubles the voice in every line except the last, where it is left poignantly to itself. A berceuse and at the same time a barcarolle, Les berceaux is linked directly in the present version to a Postlude in F major based on Fauré’s late piano Barcarolle in E flat.
Gerald Larner © 2011
Joseph Haydn (1732 - 1809)
Symphony No 96 'Miracle' (1791)
Adagio
Andante
Menuetto and Trio
Vivace
Before electricity or gaslight, grand candle chandeliers were a glorious hazard of public places. They could look magnificent, sent sparks of light glinting off cleverly cut crystals and gave rooms a magical amber light which - so they say - could enhance even the most gruesome complexion better than powders and ointments. They could also drip candle-grease, or be blown out, or, worst of all, come tumbling to the floor in a crash of deadly, glittering, shards of flying glass. That is what happened when one of Haydn’s audiences was listening to his latest symphony. Miraculously, no one was hurt, hence the nickname. Sadly, though, there was some kind of mix up: the crash actually happened during Symphony No 102 - not this piece at all. It is a blessing in disguise, though, as pieces with nicknames tend to get performed more, and this very special piece deserves all the exposure it can get.
The special delight of this piece – like so many of Haydn’s symphonies – is sharing Haydn’s love of showcasing the gifts of individual musicians in his orchestra. He did this throughout his career by writing exquisitely tailored and brief solos for them. These often make for exceptionally difficult and fine music, as though he were throwing down a gauntlet to the player in question: ‘ show us what you can do with that!” At the same time, the solos capture on paper the techniques of some of the most remarkable instrumentalists he ever came across. One of the ways that Salomon (his entrepreneur) had tempted him to Britain was with the promise of a fine orchestra – and he was as good as his word. As this particular symphony was not one of Haydn’s first pieces for London, he had had time to get to know the band rather well. A dazzling violinist led: Viotti. The later symphonies hold many fleeting solos for him, and there is a lovely example here in the slow movement. Above all, the orchestra had fine wind players. It is hard to stress enough how rare this was in Europe at the time. Mozart’s work reveals that he was lucky to know some of the finest virtuosi of the age in Vienna, and in London Haydn was delighted to find more. Even so, few composers would trust a wind section enough to feature them as prominently as Haydn does in the second and third movements. They are often soloists in their own rights rather than supporting acts to the more dependable string section. In the later London pieces, he comes to trust them more and more - it is one of the things that gives these pieces their distinctive sound and something which Beethoven was to build on.
© Svend Brown
A heart-warming richness gives Sally Matthews’ voice the special star quality that makes her the soprano of choice for maestros the world over. With Ticciati, she brings Haydn’s scena – a touch of operatic high drama to match Stravinsky’s dance – then follows it with Fauré’s heartbreaking, melancholy songs in new orchestrations from Colin Matthews commissioned by the SCO. As for the Haydn… the name says it all: truly, this symphony is a miracle – one of his very finest.
Jukka Pekka Saraste conducts the SCO in the Variation de Polymnie from Stravinsky's Apollon Musagète.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
