Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Scenes from Prometheus (1801)
Overture
Pastorale (Allegro)
Solo della Signora Casentini (Andantino - Adagio - Allegro)
Finale (Allegretto - Allegro molto)
Though his Seventh Symphony was nicknamed by Wagner “The Apotheosis of the Dance,” Beethoven and ballet seem like a contradiction in terms. Yet by the age of 31 he had composed two such scores. The first, his early Ritterballet, was merely hackwork, ghost-written for his friend Count Waldstein; but Prometheus, a few years later, was altogether more ambitious, and one of his first big Viennese successes.
Its full title, Die Geschopfe des Prometheus, has been variously translated as the Creatures, or the Creations, or the Children of Prometheus, but the story has little to do with the mythical hero who was chained to a rock, where an eagle tore at his liver until Hercules rescued him. Beethoven’s Prometheus suffers no such hardship. A more idealistic figure, he seemed something of a classical Lord Reith, who “drove ignorance from the people, and gave them manners, customs, and morals.” In Act One of this full-length ballet, he brings two statues to life. In Act Two, he delivers them to Parnassus to be instructed by Apollo and the Muses and endowed with the blessings of culture.
Sir Donald Tovey, Edinburgh University’s famous musical essayist, considered large tracts of the score to be “monotonously frivolous,” but he was being too severe. Haydn, meeting Beethoven in the street, supposedly praised the music, to which Beethoven replied: “Oh, dear Papa, you are too good, but mine is no Creation by a long shot.” The words may sound improbable, but Maynard Solomon, best of Beethoven’s modern biographers, has quoted them without reservation. The ballet in our own time has had a new lease of life, and several of the sixteen dances - not least the striking interlude for the ballerina Maria Casentini, with its solo cello and plashing harp - have regained a small place in the orchestral repertoire.
As for the overture, it has long enjoyed a separate existence as a concert piece. It is similar in style to Mozart’s Cosi fan tutte overture, and to the first movement of Beethoven’s own First Symphony, which he wrote around the same time. Each has a slow introduction, starting provocatively on a discord and continuing with a flowing, tender melody; and each then unleashes a racy, sparkling allegro, exhilarating in its momentum.
The sweet-toned Pastorale movement, which follows, anticipates the glow of the finale of the Pastoral Symphony. But - after the romantic Casentini solo - what the finale of Prometheus more startlingly anticipates is nothing less than the finale of the Eroica Symphony, with its famous Napoleon (or in this case Prometheus) theme, which for a time so obsessed Beethoven that he employed it in several of his works before bringing it to a state of symphonic perfection in the Eroica itself.
© Conrad Wilson
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart 1756-1791
Piano Concerto in B flat major, K595 (1791)
Allegro
Larghetto
Allegro
"Everything is cold for me – ice cold," wrote Mozart at the start of what was to be the last year of his life. He was not referring to the Viennese weather. His fame as Europe’s finest pianist-composer, who had brought the art of the piano concerto to its zenith, was dwindling. He had cash-flow problems, though these were in the process of being resolved. He was suffering from depression. But, as Meynard Solomon declared in his great Mozart biography, he "somehow managed to stem the drift into silence". He did so with a chain of masterpieces whose sheer quantity and variety - from The Magic Flute to the most subtle sequences of ballroom dances - he had not previously surpassed.
At the beginning of January he completed the last of his piano concertos, K595 in B flat major. His Clarinet Concerto, his last great string quintet, his last two operas, and a group of haunting miniatures - the Little German Cantata, the touching Ave Verum Corpus, the music for mechanical organ, the last few songs - still lay ahead, as also did the great unfinished Requiem. Though the last piano concerto has been thought to possess the quality of a "transfigured farewell" - a very apt phrase with which to describe it - there is not the slightest evidence that Mozart himself thought about it that way, or that when he wrote it he was more than usually aware of his own impending demise. Those who say the music contains intimations of Mozart’s death are merely being wise after the event. His death-consciousness applied to the fate of all humanity.
Yet after the glitter of the ceremonial Coronation Concerto, written three years previously, there is undoubtedly something very pared-down about K595, something conspicuously inward-looking about its mood. Its orchestration, with just a single flute, two oboes, two bassoons, two horns and strings, but no clarinets and certainly no trumpets and drums, is almost minimalist by Mozart’s standards at the time. Even the movement headings - Allegro, Larghetto, Allegro - are reduced to single words. All this seems significant, but whether it signifies death or what might have been the start of a new phase in Mozart’s output of concertos is another matter.
Whatever else he had in mind - and it seemed quite a lot - further piano concertos at that point looked unlikely. When he played K595 on 4 March 1791, it was destined to be his last public appearance as a solo pianist before his death nine months later. The person who made it possible was an old acquaintance - the successful clarinettist Joseph Baehr - who slotted it into a concert in which Mozart was quite clearly not the star. The programme, given in the hall of a restaurant owner round the corner from Mozart’s apartment, featured Baehr himself as the main attraction. Next in importance was the singer Aloysia Lange, Mozart’s sister-in-law, whom he had loved and once hoped to marry. The information that "Herr Kapellmeister Mozart will play a concerto on the fortepiano" came third in line.
Did the work’s murmuring, unhurried opening make its mark? Were the downward scales and chromaticisms thought to possess a forlorn wraithlike eloquence? Was the flow of the music, in which one theme merges with the next, perceived to be beautifully sustained or did the audience fail to grasp such extraordinary continuity of line? Mozart’s own cadenza, written into the score, adds to the first movement’s special unity, as does the similarly personal cadenza in the finale.
The simplicity of the slow movement, which one distinguished but sometimes imperceptive authority on Mozart’s concertos has deemed to be a sign of waning inspiration, is perfectly in keeping with the veiled beauty of the rest of the work. Even the buoyant main theme of the rondo finale, which in an earlier concerto might have sounded like a vigorous hunting motif, has a delicacy appropriate to the intimacy of the music. It is no surprise that Mozart employed almost the same melody in one of his last songs, entitled "Longing for Spring".
Though it might seem sentimental to point out that 1791’s was to be Mozart’s last spring, the poignancy of the music makes the temptation irresistible. Yet there is also a lightweight muscularity about this movement which makes it possible to draw quite different conclusions about its meaning. In Mozart's last piano concerto, as in so many of its great predecessors, ambiguity reigns supreme.
© Conrad Wilson
Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847)
Hebrides Overture (1829-32)
Great composers who visited Britain in the nineteenth century seldom ventured as far north as Scotland. Berlioz nearly made it in 1853, when it was suggested he perform Mendelssohn’s Elijah with the Glasgow Choral Union, but the singers refused to have him as conductor. Chopin certainly made it in 1848, though the journey nearly killed him. But it was Mendelssohn whose Scottish tour in 1829 was the most productive of its kind ever undertaken by a composer from elsewhere.
Not only did Holyrood Palace inspire the opening of his Scottish Symphony (a theme which, aptly enough, was to reappear under the title of Bad Weather at the start of another of his works) but the sight of Fingal’s Cave on the island of Staffa obviously bowled him over during his voyage to the Hebrides. In a letter to his family, he spoke of how "extraordinarily" the scene affected him, and he enclosed 21 bars of music which, he said, had sprung to mind there. These were the first bars of the Hebrides overture, though the rest of the work was not completed until he reached Italy the following year. It was then, as one of his biographers later commented, “among the laurels and orange groves that his thoughts and affections carried him back to the waves of the North Sea.”
Most of the music of the overture is built from the undulating, repeated phrase with which it opens. Wagner described the piece as an "aquarelle," and compared one passage to the wailing of sea-winds. But perhaps, in saying this, he was thinking ahead to his own Flying Dutchman overture - Mendelssohn’s, for most of the way, is a seascape recollected in tranquillity, and not even the spiky woodwind in the work's inspired middle section nor the rough waves that rise towards the end (where the pace quickens, the strings hurtle along in semiquavers, and trumpets and drums add an element of menace) are allowed to disrupt the formal perfection of the score.
When the storm subsides, we can expect the little introductory motif to be still there, and so it is. It has already provided a link with the theme of the second subject, first heard on bassoons and cellos and subsequently, in a poetically extended form, on the clarinets. Sir Donald Tovey, in one of his famous essays, declared this to be quite the greatest melody Mendelssohn ever wrote, but notice how it makes its point in the first place without disturbing the natural flow of the music. Facile? Subtle? There may be works by Mendelssohn that tread a tightrope between these qualities, but the grey and silver beauty of the Hebrides overture shows the hand of a master.
© Conrad Wilson
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791)
Piano Concerto No 20 in D minor, K466
Allegro
Romance
Allegro assai
It is not difficult to understand why the nineteenth century kept Mozart’s D minor piano concerto on the concert platform while ignoring many of his other works, for it is quintessentially Romantic in nature.
Mozart’s D minor concerto is dark and surprising in its outer movements while cradling a central slow movement of such tender lyricism that it would take a heart of steel not to succumb to its blandishments. The turbulence of the opening movement is offset by a Rondo finale that is full of irregularities – it even harks back to the tempestuous first movement. The unusual (for Mozart) addition of two trumpets and timpani to the orchestra for this concerto also contributes to the drama. But when all is said and done, Mozart cannot resist providing us with a ‘happy ending’ by concluding his masterpiece triumphantly in D major.
Given the unsettling parry and thrust of this concerto, it is astonishing to learn that the copyists were still busy writing out the orchestral parts the day before the concert. The orchestral musicians must have been the very best in Vienna, for the ever-critical Leopold Mozart (who arrived just in time to hear his son give the first performance of the concerto in Vienna in February 1785) noted how wonderfully the entire subscription concert had been performed – and the orchestral parts are no mere trifling accompaniment. The writing for both soloist and orchestra is powerful and dramatic, with the orchestra playing an equally important part in the musical development of the work. It is not hard to hear why Beethoven, who performed this concerto frequently, should have been so attracted to this magnificent specimen of Mozart’s art – but then, so are we all.
K466 has always been a regular visitor to the concert platform, and will continue to be so as long as we have ears! It is a perfect example of why music can so deeply touch human emotions while mere words can only hope to scratch the surface. But then, that is why Mozart is one of the immortals – his music goes straight to the heart.
© David Gardner
The Philadelphia Chamber Music Society welcomes Piotr Anderszewski and the SCO as they juxtapose the stormy, operatic drama of K466 and the near Beethovenian breadth of K595 – Mozart’s last piano concerto.
For more information, click here
Jean Sibelius (1865 - 1957)
Rakastava Suite Op14
The Lover
The Path of the Beloved
Goodnight - Farewell
Surprisingly, given how well it sounds on strings, this music was originally conceived as a suite of four songs for male voice choir. Sibelius wrote them for a competition in 1894, drawing on folksongs for his texts: a popular gesture at a time when his own standing as a national composer was growing. These songs are short, telling of a tryst which sadly must end in parting at dawn. Sibelius did not win the competition - he was beaten into second place by his former teacher - but he clearly valued these pieces, as he turned to them again 18 years later to create this suite.
The second decade of the 20th century was a complicated period for Sibelius. Personal, financial, and artistic difficulties converged in long wrangling years following a near-fatal illness. During this period he wrote his Fourth and Fifth Symphonies, and his Violin Concerto. The latter two works survive in multiple versions, perhaps reflecting Sibelius’ uncertain and indecisive frame of mind. Between the major works, he wrote numerous shorter pieces – and the transformation of Rakastava from song to strings took place in the wake of the Fourth Symphony, in 1911-12.
Sibelius did not so much re-arrange the originals as recompose them. The song behind the first movement originally had a very simple, note-on-note texture, in contrast to the intense, almost tragically atmospheric harmonies Sibelius weaves around the melody in the revision. And in the last movement, he creates something approaching symphonic development where originally there was a simple and strong narrative, sung often by a solo tenor against great choral chords. Only in the middle movement did he leave the music relatively untouched.
© Svend Brown
Edvard Grieg (1843-1907)
Holberg Suite (1884)
Praeludium
Sarabande
Gavotte
Air
Rigaudon
Musically, the decades around the turn of the 20th century were years of rebellion and revolution. The seeds of modernism were sown as composers flouted convention and astonished audiences with new sounds, harmonies, orchestrations…they questioned the very basics of musical theory. Paradoxically these years also saw a rediscovery of the distant past. Music which lay undisturbed in libraries for centuries was dusted down, played and made available once more in new performing editions. Composers, consequently, were inspired to write quasi-antique music. Neo-classicism is a label that is most often associated with Stravinsky’s clever and witty take on the past; but before he added irony to the mix, it was used to describe music which relished a nostalgia for bygone ages.
Grieg’s Holberg Suite of 1884 fits this description. He wrote it to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of Ludvig Holberg, a great Danish-Norwegian philosopher and playwright. Holberg has been called a kind of Scandinavian Moliere, and the evidence suggests that he earned his place in such elevated company well. His comedies were widely popular, and he also wrote extensively on philosophy and produced several very influential books of ideas. He was a thoroughly cosmopolitan figure who traveled far and wide within Europe – often on foot – and while at home he stayed in touch with the rest of Europe through books and letters.
Grieg pays tribute to this cultural hero by creating a suite of dances from his time – very much in the manner of J S Bach. He opens with a tearaway prelude and then moves onto the dance floor. Each movement respects the character of the different dances forms without being enslaved by 18th century mannerisms. Grieg was not interested in forgeries: this music is unmistakably his, and unapologetically 19th century.
© Svend Brown
Around 1900, Scandinavian music flowered as it had never done before. Suddenly, every one of the Nordic nations boasted a composer of international fame, and writing irresistibly well for strings seems to have been an instinctive gift for all of them. Three (from Denmark, Finland and Norway) are featured here: Sibelius tells a love story without words, Grieg pays tribute to the dances of olden time while Nielsen’s Little Suite was originally presented as being by “Mr. Carl Nielsen, whom nobody knows.” How quickly that was to change!
William Schuman (1910-1992)
Symphony for Strings (1943)
I Molto agitato ed energico
II Larghissimo
III Presto
William Schuman was an influential man: besides composing, he was director of publications for G. Schirmer, Inc., President of the Juilliard School and first president of the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts in New York. Musically he was catholic in his tastes, and integrated American jazz and folk traditions into his work; but if there were core qualities to his style, they were clarity of structure and dynamism - both characteristic of this Symphony for Strings.
It was written in wartime (1943), and a great success at its premiere, soon performed all around America. It’s a great tour de force for strings - the ensemble writing is demanding, exposed and richly inventive. Plenty about it sounds almost baroque, not least the fugal writing and Schuman’s penchant for juxtaposing the complex many-voiced textures with moments of utter unity: the whole orchestra playing one melody, or gloriously resonant chords (especially towards the end of the first movement) or the chorale-like opening of the slow movement. Tension between those extremes is a principal source of drama in this piece.
Each movement ends where it began, with the same musical gesture or material. Between these musical frames, musical arguments are developed freely, but carry the force of logic. The slow movement is a great example. After the dreamy, chorale-like chords, Schuman embarks on a passacaglia (upper strings carrying a wide-ranging melody above a tread-like pizzicato below) which gradually builds for around 2 minutes then yields to a more animated section, which builds to a climactic return to the opening chorale. There is not a single awkward gear shift, only a great sense of inevitability and natural progression about the timing and development of the music, which all three movement share.
© Svend Brown
SCO co-commission with the Swedish Chamber Orchestra, with funding from the Scottish Government.
Albert Schnelzer (b. 1972)
Oboe Concerto – The Enchanter
The Oboe Concerto consists of three movements that are to be performed attacca. The concerto has two main sources of inspiration. First, obviously the soloist Francois Leleux (for whom the concerto is written). We met for the first time in the USA the summer of 2006 at a music festival when my Bassoon Concerto was being premiered. After hearing it Francois immediately asked me to write an Oboe Concerto for him. The Scottish Chamber Orchestra and The Swedish Chamber Orchestra agreed to co-commission the work.
The playing of Francois is something really unique and I have never heard an oboe being played like this before. A complete control of the technical side of playing, combined with an extraordinarily musical sense, makes the title ”The Enchanter” very fitting for how one will experience the playing of Francois Leleux. He enchants his audience and it is a nearly magical experience to hear him play.
The other source of inspiration is the novel "The Enchantress of Florence" by Salman Rushdie. The same novel inspired me for my String Quartet No. 2 – Emperor Akbar that I wrote for the Brodsky Quartet. The story takes place in India and Italy by the end of the 16th century. A young man with bright, golden hair and western looks, who calls himself ”Mogor dell’Amore” arrives at the Mughal Empire. He approaches the Emperor and claims to be the Mughals long-lost uncle! With stories and tales about the adventures of his mother, the young man enchants the Emperor and the court and eventually approves his likings. This young man is seen as a magician and enchanter and in many ways he is a soloist with the same enchanting effect as Francois Leleux. Salman Rushdie has rightly been described as a symphonist of litterature and the way he ”orchestrates” his prose is an endless source of inspiration for me. The so-called ”magical realism” that is used by Rushdie is very useful when you are dealing with musical form. One is sucked into a universe where everything can happen and everything is possible…
The Concerto is dedicated to Francois Leleux.
© Albert Schnelzer
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Symphony No 7 in A major, Op 92 (1813)
Poco sostenuto - Vivace
Allegretto
Presto
Allegro con brio
Wagner, in tribute to the relentless rhythmic vitality of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony, hailed it as the "apotheosis of the dance." The same, with more justification, could be said of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, since it was intentionally written as dance music. Separated from each other by exactly a hundred years, each work could be called the rhythmic ne plus ultra of its time. The Rite caused a riot in Paris in 1913. The premiere of the Seventh Symphony in Vienna in 1813 convinced some listeners that Beethoven had gone mad, though its unstoppable verve, exhilarating yet awesome, prompted others to assume that it was inspired (like the Battle Symphony, included in the same programme) by the retreat of Napoleon and the promise of European peace. The concert in which it was first performed, indeed, was for the benefit of Austrian and Bavarian soldiers wounded at the battle of Hanau.
In itself, the music is never peaceful. There is scarcely a moment when the work is at rest. Even the slow movement proceeds with an inexorable tread, based on a repeated rhythm that shifts from section to section of the orchestra and is never absent. Each of the four movements, in fact, has its own dominating pulse. Unlike the Fifth Symphony, which moves steadily towards final triumph, the Seventh is a study in circling motion.
The big opening chords, followed by repeatedly rising scales for the strings that will ferociously return at top speed towards the end of the finale, create an impression of size and grandeur. Thereafter the swinging rhythm of the vivace section of the first movement acts like a dynamo that is never switched off. It even seethes softly throughout a famously extended passage for cellos and basses, before erupting with renewed force and with whooping horns in the closing bars.
After the major-key brilliance of the first movement, the minor-key melancholy of the succeeding Allegretto, audible in its very opening note, sounds funereal. Yet the pace is too fast for a funeral march, even if the structure is similar to that of the marcia funebre in the Eroica symphony. There is solemnity here, rather than grief. The middle section, with its clarinet melody, is wistful. But the pulse is what matters, and it underpins every change of mood or colour.
In the scherzo, the fast circling motion resumes. Since this is one of Beethoven’s extended scherzos with two contrasted trio sections - and, at the very end, an attempt to launch a third one -repetition is strongly emphasised. The rhythms continue to heave until five whiplash chords sever the continuity. But in the finale, described by Edinburgh's distinguished musical authority Donald Francis Tovey as a "triumph of Bacchic fury," it immediately resumes. Here, in the ceaseless interplay of short motifs and repeated sections, we are made more than ever aware of Beethoven’s obsessiveness, until the music finally seems to hurtle into the abyss.
© Conrad Wilson
Within weeks, the SCO performs the two most contrasting of all Beethoven’s symphonies (don’t miss Beethoven’s Fourth on 3 December). Delirious, driving rhythms make his Seventh Symphony an ideal finale to this concert with its barely concealed theme of ‘dance’. William Schuman’s sprung and spry writing for strings is a pleasure to the ear – and there’s a chance to sample the work of a young man from Sweden who is making waves internationally. For Albert Schnelzer, the essence of music boils down to two things: singing and dancing. He is in perfect company here.
William Schuman (1910-1992)
Symphony for Strings (1943)
I Molto agitato ed energico
II Larghissimo
III Presto
William Schuman was an influential man: besides composing, he was director of publications for G. Schirmer, Inc., President of the Juilliard School and first president of the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts in New York. Musically he was catholic in his tastes, and integrated American jazz and folk traditions into his work; but if there were core qualities to his style, they were clarity of structure and dynamism - both characteristic of this Symphony for Strings.
It was written in wartime (1943), and a great success at its premiere, soon performed all around America. It’s a great tour de force for strings - the ensemble writing is demanding, exposed and richly inventive. Plenty about it sounds almost baroque, not least the fugal writing and Schuman’s penchant for juxtaposing the complex many-voiced textures with moments of utter unity: the whole orchestra playing one melody, or gloriously resonant chords (especially towards the end of the first movement) or the chorale-like opening of the slow movement. Tension between those extremes is a principal source of drama in this piece.
Each movement ends where it began, with the same musical gesture or material. Between these musical frames, musical arguments are developed freely, but carry the force of logic. The slow movement is a great example. After the dreamy, chorale-like chords, Schuman embarks on a passacaglia (upper strings carrying a wide-ranging melody above a tread-like pizzicato below) which gradually builds for around 2 minutes then yields to a more animated section, which builds to a climactic return to the opening chorale. There is not a single awkward gear shift, only a great sense of inevitability and natural progression about the timing and development of the music, which all three movement share.
© Svend Brown
SCO co-commission with the Swedish Chamber Orchestra, with funding from the Scottish Government.
Albert Schnelzer (b. 1972)
Oboe Concerto – The Enchanter
The Oboe Concerto consists of three movements that are to be performed attacca. The concerto has two main sources of inspiration. First, obviously the soloist Francois Leleux (for whom the concerto is written). We met for the first time in the USA the summer of 2006 at a music festival when my Bassoon Concerto was being premiered. After hearing it Francois immediately asked me to write an Oboe Concerto for him. The Scottish Chamber Orchestra and The Swedish Chamber Orchestra agreed to co-commission the work.
The playing of Francois is something really unique and I have never heard an oboe being played like this before. A complete control of the technical side of playing, combined with an extraordinarily musical sense, makes the title ”The Enchanter” very fitting for how one will experience the playing of Francois Leleux. He enchants his audience and it is a nearly magical experience to hear him play.
The other source of inspiration is the novel "The Enchantress of Florence" by Salman Rushdie. The same novel inspired me for my String Quartet No. 2 – Emperor Akbar that I wrote for the Brodsky Quartet. The story takes place in India and Italy by the end of the 16th century. A young man with bright, golden hair and western looks, who calls himself ”Mogor dell’Amore” arrives at the Mughal Empire. He approaches the Emperor and claims to be the Mughals long-lost uncle! With stories and tales about the adventures of his mother, the young man enchants the Emperor and the court and eventually approves his likings. This young man is seen as a magician and enchanter and in many ways he is a soloist with the same enchanting effect as Francois Leleux. Salman Rushdie has rightly been described as a symphonist of litterature and the way he ”orchestrates” his prose is an endless source of inspiration for me. The so-called ”magical realism” that is used by Rushdie is very useful when you are dealing with musical form. One is sucked into a universe where everything can happen and everything is possible…
The Concerto is dedicated to Francois Leleux.
© Albert Schnelzer
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Symphony No 7 in A major, Op 92 (1813)
Poco sostenuto - Vivace
Allegretto
Presto
Allegro con brio
Wagner, in tribute to the relentless rhythmic vitality of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony, hailed it as the "apotheosis of the dance." The same, with more justification, could be said of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, since it was intentionally written as dance music. Separated from each other by exactly a hundred years, each work could be called the rhythmic ne plus ultra of its time. The Rite caused a riot in Paris in 1913. The premiere of the Seventh Symphony in Vienna in 1813 convinced some listeners that Beethoven had gone mad, though its unstoppable verve, exhilarating yet awesome, prompted others to assume that it was inspired (like the Battle Symphony, included in the same programme) by the retreat of Napoleon and the promise of European peace. The concert in which it was first performed, indeed, was for the benefit of Austrian and Bavarian soldiers wounded at the battle of Hanau.
In itself, the music is never peaceful. There is scarcely a moment when the work is at rest. Even the slow movement proceeds with an inexorable tread, based on a repeated rhythm that shifts from section to section of the orchestra and is never absent. Each of the four movements, in fact, has its own dominating pulse. Unlike the Fifth Symphony, which moves steadily towards final triumph, the Seventh is a study in circling motion.
The big opening chords, followed by repeatedly rising scales for the strings that will ferociously return at top speed towards the end of the finale, create an impression of size and grandeur. Thereafter the swinging rhythm of the vivace section of the first movement acts like a dynamo that is never switched off. It even seethes softly throughout a famously extended passage for cellos and basses, before erupting with renewed force and with whooping horns in the closing bars.
After the major-key brilliance of the first movement, the minor-key melancholy of the succeeding Allegretto, audible in its very opening note, sounds funereal. Yet the pace is too fast for a funeral march, even if the structure is similar to that of the marcia funebre in the Eroica symphony. There is solemnity here, rather than grief. The middle section, with its clarinet melody, is wistful. But the pulse is what matters, and it underpins every change of mood or colour.
In the scherzo, the fast circling motion resumes. Since this is one of Beethoven’s extended scherzos with two contrasted trio sections - and, at the very end, an attempt to launch a third one -repetition is strongly emphasised. The rhythms continue to heave until five whiplash chords sever the continuity. But in the finale, described by Edinburgh's distinguished musical authority Donald Francis Tovey as a "triumph of Bacchic fury," it immediately resumes. Here, in the ceaseless interplay of short motifs and repeated sections, we are made more than ever aware of Beethoven’s obsessiveness, until the music finally seems to hurtle into the abyss.
© Conrad Wilson
Within weeks, the SCO performs the two most contrasting of all Beethoven’s symphonies (don’t miss Beethoven’s Fourth on 2 December). Delirious, driving rhythms make his Seventh Symphony an ideal finale to this concert with its barely concealed theme of ‘dance’. William Schuman’s sprung and spry writing for strings is a pleasure to the ear – and there’s a chance to sample the work of a young man from Sweden who is making waves internationally. For Albert Schnelzer, the essence of music boils down to two things: singing and dancing. He is in perfect company here.
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Messiah
The present-day standing of Messiah makes it difficult for us to realise that for Handel its composition was an offbeat venture, unsure in its reward, and probably unrepeatable. It is the only truly ‘sacred’ oratorio he ever wrote, it was the only one performed during his lifetime in a consecrated building, and yet it was intended, in Jennen’s words, as “a fine Entertainment”. Although quintessentially the work of a theatre composer, it contains no drama in the theatrical sense; there are no warring factions (no Israelites versus Philistines), no named protagonist; the text telescopes prophecy and fulfilment, and the drama is revealed obliquely, by inference and report, almost never by narrative.
The scheme was, of course, the responsibility of the librettist, and Jennens deserves more praise than he is sometimes allowed. Avoiding the choral emphasis in Israel in Egypt, he opted for the same proportion of solos to choruses as had worked so well in L’Allegro. Even so, Messiah has a higher choral element than any other of the oratorios, Israel and Egypt excepted. Old and New Testaments are skilfully blended, with some tactful adaptations and compression. Most important of all is the clarity and confidence with which Jennens displays the divine scheme, a coherent progress from Prophecy, through Nativity, Crucifixion, Resurrection and Ascension to the promise of Redemption (Part III is based largely on the Anglican Burial Service). The work thus encompasses all the major festivals of the Christian Year.
If the first triumph in Messiah is its text, what of the music? It has been argued that Messiah does not contain Handel’s greatest music: for greater arias we need look no further than Rinaldo (1711) with ‘Lascia ch’io pianga’ or ‘Cara sposa’, and greater choruses may be found in both Israel in Egypt and Dixit Dominus. What Messiah does possess is an enormous strength - its cornerstone being ‘I know that my Redeemer liveth’ - and for many it has become the musical representation of their Faith.
Handel wrote Messiah in very short time - between 22nd August and 14th September 1741. It was given its first performance not in London, where Handel’s influence had declined with the demise of Italian opera, but in Dublin in the New Music Hall on the 13 April 1742. Dublin was delighted to have England’s (formerly) most eminent musician, and made sure that the performing conditions pleased the composer. Already there had been 12 sold-out subscription concerts prior to the premiere, which was a huge triumph. The contrast between the big choral numbers and the calmer more melismatic arias delighted the audience. Because of Handel’s uncertainty with performing conditions in Dublin, the original scoring consisted of only one solo instrument - the trumpet - and accompanying strings and continuo. For later London performances Handel added oboes and bassoons to double the voices in the choruses.
A romantic notion is of Handel lying exhausted on completion of Messiah - if that is true he soon started work in earnest again, since by the 29th September 1741, he had already completed Act One of Samson and finished the whole work within a month. If Messiah failed he knew he would have a success with the far grander epic in Samson.
Recent scholarship and performance practice has shown Messiah being given with only a handful of singers just as Handel originally heard it. However, as Malcolm Sargent wrote: “I am convinced that had more singers been available, he would have rejoiced to have had a choir of several hundred for his first performance because Handel was renowned for his ‘big’ effects- he was criticised by his rivals for being a ‘noisy’ composer, for wanting twice as many voices in his chorus and twice as many instrumentalists as was usual.”
Tonight’s performance is very much a compromise between the ‘authentic’ performance and the vast Royal Choral tradition which Handel may have preferred - despite all that scholarship.
© Christopher Hogwood/Graeme Jenkins
The Scottish Chamber Orchestra is joined by the SCO Chorus and world-class soloists in Handel's masterpiece!
*** Stephen Layton replaces the late Sir Charles Mackerras in this performance ***
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Messiah
The present-day standing of Messiah makes it difficult for us to realise that for Handel its composition was an offbeat venture, unsure in its reward, and probably unrepeatable. It is the only truly ‘sacred’ oratorio he ever wrote, it was the only one performed during his lifetime in a consecrated building, and yet it was intended, in Jennen’s words, as “a fine Entertainment”. Although quintessentially the work of a theatre composer, it contains no drama in the theatrical sense; there are no warring factions (no Israelites versus Philistines), no named protagonist; the text telescopes prophecy and fulfilment, and the drama is revealed obliquely, by inference and report, almost never by narrative.
The scheme was, of course, the responsibility of the librettist, and Jennens deserves more praise than he is sometimes allowed. Avoiding the choral emphasis in Israel in Egypt, he opted for the same proportion of solos to choruses as had worked so well in L’Allegro. Even so, Messiah has a higher choral element than any other of the oratorios, Israel and Egypt excepted. Old and New Testaments are skilfully blended, with some tactful adaptations and compression. Most important of all is the clarity and confidence with which Jennens displays the divine scheme, a coherent progress from Prophecy, through Nativity, Crucifixion, Resurrection and Ascension to the promise of Redemption (Part III is based largely on the Anglican Burial Service). The work thus encompasses all the major festivals of the Christian Year.
If the first triumph in Messiah is its text, what of the music? It has been argued that Messiah does not contain Handel’s greatest music: for greater arias we need look no further than Rinaldo (1711) with ‘Lascia ch’io pianga’ or ‘Cara sposa’, and greater choruses may be found in both Israel in Egypt and Dixit Dominus. What Messiah does possess is an enormous strength - its cornerstone being ‘I know that my Redeemer liveth’ - and for many it has become the musical representation of their Faith.
Handel wrote Messiah in very short time - between 22nd August and 14th September 1741. It was given its first performance not in London, where Handel’s influence had declined with the demise of Italian opera, but in Dublin in the New Music Hall on the 13 April 1742. Dublin was delighted to have England’s (formerly) most eminent musician, and made sure that the performing conditions pleased the composer. Already there had been 12 sold-out subscription concerts prior to the premiere, which was a huge triumph. The contrast between the big choral numbers and the calmer more melismatic arias delighted the audience. Because of Handel’s uncertainty with performing conditions in Dublin, the original scoring consisted of only one solo instrument - the trumpet - and accompanying strings and continuo. For later London performances Handel added oboes and bassoons to double the voices in the choruses.
A romantic notion is of Handel lying exhausted on completion of Messiah - if that is true he soon started work in earnest again, since by the 29th September 1741, he had already completed Act One of Samson and finished the whole work within a month. If Messiah failed he knew he would have a success with the far grander epic in Samson.
Recent scholarship and performance practice has shown Messiah being given with only a handful of singers just as Handel originally heard it. However, as Malcolm Sargent wrote: “I am convinced that had more singers been available, he would have rejoiced to have had a choir of several hundred for his first performance because Handel was renowned for his ‘big’ effects- he was criticised by his rivals for being a ‘noisy’ composer, for wanting twice as many voices in his chorus and twice as many instrumentalists as was usual.”
Tonight’s performance is very much a compromise between the ‘authentic’ performance and the vast Royal Choral tradition which Handel may have preferred - despite all that scholarship.
© Christopher Hogwood/Graeme Jenkins
The Scottish Chamber Orchestra is joined by the SCO Chorus and world-class soloists in Handel's masterpiece!
*** Stephen Layton replaces the late Sir Charles Mackerras in this performance ***

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.

