Antonín Dvořák (1841–1904)
From Ten Legends, Op 59:
No 1 in D minor: Allegretto
No 2 in G major: Molto moderato
No 3 in G minor: Allegretto giusto – Andante – Allegretto giusto
No 8 in F major: Un poco allegretto e grazioso
No 10 in B flat minor and major: Andante
Dvořák gained his first international success in the years 1876-78, with the Moravian Duets – recommended by Brahms to his publisher Simrock – and then with the three Slavonic Rhapsodies and the first set of Slavonic Dances. Not long afterwards, in 1881, came a follow-up in the shape of the Ten Legends, again based on melodies which, while original, are of distinctly Slavonic cast. Sometimes these pieces seems to hint at an underlying narrative, and scholars have suggested that some of the themes may have been suggested by the rhythm of key lines in KJ Erben’s collection of folk-inspired ballads. But if Dvořák did have specific Czech legends in mind, he kept the information to himself – so we are left only with a general feeling of what the composer’s biographer Jarmil Burghauser called “forgotten stories of long-past, patriarchal times”.
Like the Slavonic Dances, the Legends were first written for piano duet and then orchestrated, with all Dvořák’s habitual skill and inventiveness. The strings are as ever the foundation of the score, with sections often divided into two parts to provide extra shades of colour. The woodwind – two each of flutes, oboes, clarinets and bassoons – all have moments of prominence as carriers of the melody, singly or in pairs. Dvořák’s use of four horns rather than two offers the possibility of rich harmonic filling-in in the middle of the orchestral texture, though the first horn is also used in its higher register for some striking solos. This basic orchestra is slightly augmented in some individual numbers – in tonight’s selection by timpani in No 1 and a triangle in No 3.
The first Legend sets off with a tune characterised by sturdy dance rhythms and strong dynamic contrasts; this all but disappears from the later stages of the piece, however, and the last word goes to the smooth melody of the middle section. The second piece has a graceful opening theme in three-bar phrases, a volatile middle section with a good deal of development, and a brief reprise leading to a calm ending. The third comes closer to the model of the Slavonic Dances, not only in its initial lithe dance rhythms, but also in its clear ternary (A–B–A) construction around a slower middle section (largely in five-bar phrases). No 8 begins in a gentle pastoral 6/8 time, but soon becomes more restless; the middle section includes passages in the cross-rhythms of the Czech furiant, anticipating the scherzo of Dvořák’s Seventh Symphony of 1884-85, as well as a somewhat Beethovenian melody which returns on horn in the coda. The final Legend alternates between an expressive minor-key melody, again soon pushing forward, and a calmer major-key idea; the coda reconciles the two with a delicate new major-key version of the opening theme, and a tinge of the minor just before the quiet ending.
Anthony Burton © 2010
György Ligeti (1923-2006)
Piano Concerto (1985-8)
When György Ligeti died in 2006 aged 83, the world lost a musical genius. Despite Stalinist era restrictions, which put a brake on experimention in Eastern Europe, Ligeti emerged, with Lutoslawski, Penderecki and Kurtág, as a composer who forged his own language and influenced following generations.
Having lost members of his family in the Holocaust, Ligeti found it even more impossible to contemplate composing in Hungary after the 1956 crackdown. Like others, he fled to Vienna, and then worked with Stockhausen in Cologne and lectured in Germany (especially Hamburg) and Scandinavia.
His important works began appearing in the late 1950s, and were followed by a flurry of 1960s pieces that are already classics, leading on to the Chamber Concerto, Violin Concerto and Ramifications.
Tonight’s Piano Concerto, premiered in Graz and Vienna, belongs to a slightly later period. This fertile phase began after his opera Le Grand Macabre with the Horn Trio (1982). It was characterised less by massed blocks of sound and hyperactive clusterings (a feature he shared with Lutoslawski) and more by renewed emphasis on music’s traditional elements, including melody. The polytonality or atonality of Ligeti’s earlier works gave way to more of a traditional sense of key.
Ligeti’s substantial orchestra here include three notable features: translucent effects from using just single woodwind; a mind-boggling array of percussion, including crotales, tom-toms, a guiro (an Afro-American notched gourd), flexatone and chromonica, designed for one or two percussionists; and the use of an alto Ocarina, a hauntingly resonating, flute-like Central American instrument.
The concerto, which Ligeti described as "my most complex and difficult score so far" (20 years on, you needn’t be put off by that now!), is in five imaginitively contrasted movements, lasting around four minutes each apart from the slow Lento. Rather than functioning as a traditional concerto instrument, the piano joins in the textures, although not without a few highly effective cadenza-like passages.
The opening Vivace begins mechanically like an excitable perpetuo moto, with audible shades of Bartók. Urgent patterns remind us that Ligeti was interested with the repetitions of Central African music: the result is frenetic yet also attractive. Wood block, temple block and (later) flute-led woodwind join in with abandon: like Ravel’s Piano Concerto or Bolero, it sounds like the apotheosis of the dance, till it all suddenly evaporates.
Linked by a long-held note in double bass, the Lento’s desolate wailings of woodwind, especially ocarina, conjure an atmospheric woodland feeling. Is it owls or wolves, serene or threatening? The piano muses on an important descending pattern in low register; eerie harmonics and blaring brass get added. A shrill climax is reached and a short, uplifting trumpet solo intervenes before final stasis is reached over ocarina and lingering low brass.
Next the soloist intones a cantabile ‘song’ over a woodwind moto perpetuo. Here whole-tone patterns (related to the previous movement’s diatonic version) recall not just Debussy but also the sonorities of Tippett’s piano concerto. Later Bartók presides again (think of The Wooden Prince); and from then on, it’s all helter-skelter till the brief subsidence.
Although marked Allegro, the fourth section is in effect a second slow movement, punctuated by mysterious silences: Messiaen’s chirpy Catalogue des Oiseaux was maybe an influence; while later woodwind and brass eloboration again suggest the wilder decorative filigree of medieval music. The Finale’s ‘luminoso’ again evokes Debussy: despite the activity, the material is fragrant, with saxophone making its own contributions, and piano and brass increasingly violent and insistent before a mini-cadenza and coda-like envoi from everyone heralds the concerto’s sudden, clacking farewell.
© Roderic Dunnet
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827)
Symphony No 6 in F, Op 68, 'Pastoral' (1807-08)
Allegro ma non troppo - The awakening of happy feelings on arriving in the country
Andante molto moto - By the brook
Allegro - The joyful gathering of country folk
Allegro - Thunderstorm
Allegretto - Shepherds' thanksgiving after the storm
Composers have been evoking nature in music as long as they have been writing it down — and probably well before that. Birds, storms, streams and sunrises are a common feature of many 18th-century works, most famously (now, at least) in Vivaldi’s Four Seasons. So this piece, written in 1807-08 looked back to a grand tradition, but at the same time was one of the most original and influential works of the 19th century. It is hard to imagine the nature pictures of Berlioz, Mendelssohn, Wagner, and Strauss without it.
The debate about how important it is too know the ‘story’ behind the music will never end. Beethoven himself was conflicted. This is the only one of his symphonies that follows an explicit program. "Pastoral Symphony, or Recollections of Country Life," he wrote at the head of the score, and each movement has its own tale to tell. Yet, in the sketches for the piece he wrote, "All painting in instrumental music is lost if it is pushed too far” and “Anyone with a notion of country life can discern for himself the composer’s intentions without many titles. . . . The whole will be recognized as a matter more of feeling than of painting in sounds." But it is hard not to think he is protesting too much. He clearly enjoyed imitating birdsong in the second movement (nightingale, cuckoo and quail). And his buffoonish village band is affectionately portrayed in the third movement: who knows which band inspired this hilarious vignette, or how much they drank before they played!
Tchaikovsky used to insist that Beethoven’s Fifth has just as obvious a story as the Pastoral though it is not put into words. Certainly, there are striking similarities between the two pieces. Both were first heard in the same enormously long concert in 1808. The audience who endured the many hours in a cold theatre could have been forgiven for believing Beethoven had created an altogether new form, so dramatically do these pieces differ from any symphony that they may have heard previously. Notably, both symphonies close with a linked sequence of movements, huge expanses of sound in which Beethoven explores startling transitions and expressive effects. He also asks for an unusually large orchestra in both symphonies, including trombones, piccolo and contrabassoon – none of which were standard for the time. Yet, in both pieces he holds these extra instruments in reserve until dramatic points late in the piece. The differences between the works are equally striking. The kinetic energy that crackles through the opening bars of the Fifth does not let up until the close; the question posed in its opening bars is not truly answered until the finale, some 20 minutes later. In the Sixth, by contrast, there is hardly a straight line. Harmony is soft, its arguments deceptively discursive. Beethoven dwells on picturesque details and allows lovely moments to flower, seemingly without concern for the overall picture. At least that is the illusion Beethoven creates. More than any other symphony of his, this offers repose.
© Svend Brown
Ticciati’s first Beethoven with the SCO shares the programme with Dvořák’s immensely likeable Legends and a 20th century classic by one of the greatest composers of our time. Ligeti is very unusual in that he wears his sense of humour on his sleeve. Even in his weightiest work there is room for a clownish moment or quirky feature. Here he requires slide-whistle, ocarina and kazoo and sets the pianist one of the most virtuoso tests imaginable. Not to be missed..
The Orchestra performed Beethoven's Symphonies Nos 1-8 at the 2006 Edinburgh International Festival, under Sir Charles Mackerras. The performances were recorded by Hyperion and released as a 5-disc CD box set. The Philarmonia Orchestra perform Symphony No 9. Buy from the SCO Online Shop.

Save money with an SCO concert subscription and get a free concert, £5 CD voucher and many other benefits.

Become an SCO Patron, join the 250 Society, take advantage of sponsorship opportunities or our Corporate Members scheme.
Be the first to know – get the latest SCO news direct to your inbox Register now
© Scottish Chamber Orchestra Registered Office: Scottish Chamber Orchestra, 4 Royal Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 5AB, Scotland
Company Registration Number: 75079. A charity registered in Scotland No. SC015039.
